AGMI vs. SPPP.L
AGMI (Themes Silver Miners ETF) and SPPP.L (Invesco Physical Platinum) are both exchange-traded funds - AGMI is a Silver fund tracking the STOXX Global Silver Mining Index, while SPPP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AGMI returned 77.19% vs 16.70% for SPPP.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AGMI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SPPP.L.
Performance
AGMI vs. SPPP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AGMI is traded in USD, while SPPP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPPP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGMI achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly higher than SPPP.L's -22.18% return.
AGMI
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -15.37%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -6.87%
- 1Y
- 77.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPPP.L
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -19.09%
- YTD
- -22.18%
- 6M
- -29.47%
- 1Y
- 16.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.36%
- 10Y*
- 3.71%
AGMI vs. SPPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF | -5.19% | 176.11% | -0.74% |
SPPP.L Invesco Physical Platinum | -22.18% | 120.27% | -5.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGMI and SPPP.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between AGMI and SPPP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGMI vs. SPPP.L — Risk / Return Rank
AGMI
SPPP.L
AGMI vs. SPPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGMI | SPPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.10 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 0.37 | +1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.34 | 0.83 | +4.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGMI vs. SPPP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGMI drawdown since its inception was -34.40%, smaller than the maximum SPPP.L drawdown of -62.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGMI and SPPP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGMI | SPPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.40% | -62.33% | +27.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.40% | -45.13% | +10.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -45.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.58% | -45.13% | +13.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -34.84% | +25.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.51% | 20.11% | -5.60% |
Volatility
AGMI vs. SPPP.L - Volatility Comparison
Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) has a higher volatility of 19.24% compared to Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) at 10.96%. This indicates that AGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGMI | SPPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.24% | 10.96% | +8.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.02% | 41.26% | +2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.85% | 47.76% | +4.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.98% | 32.49% | +12.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.98% | 29.35% | +15.63% |
AGMI vs. SPPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPPP.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGMI vs. SPPP.L - Dividend Comparison
AGMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, while SPPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF | 4.67% | 4.43% | 1.81% |
SPPP.L Invesco Physical Platinum | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGMI and SPPP.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPPP.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPPP.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AGMI.
AGMI is categorized as Silver, while SPPP.L is Precious Metals. AGMI tracks STOXX Global Silver Mining Index, while SPPP.L tracks Platinum. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AGMI and 0.19% for SPPP.L.
Find the right allocation for AGMI and SPPP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer