AGIQ vs. FAI
AGIQ (SoFi Agentic AI ETF) and FAI (First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds - AGIQ tracks the BITA US Agentic AI Select Index while FAI tracks the Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. AGIQ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FAI.
Performance
AGIQ vs. FAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGIQ achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly lower than FAI's 23.08% return.
AGIQ
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FAI
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 21.54%
- YTD
- 23.08%
- 1Y
- 40.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 35.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $89.14K | $98.01K | $199.12K | |
| $1.56M | $3.03M | $3.57M |
AGIQ vs. FAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF | 5.61% | 13.79% |
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 23.08% | 13.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGIQ and FAI is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGIQ vs. FAI — Risk / Return Rank
AGIQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FAI
AGIQ vs. FAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ) and First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGIQ | FAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGIQ vs. FAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGIQ drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum FAI drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGIQ and FAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGIQ | FAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -27.82% | +8.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.46% | -12.57% | +6.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -5.77% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.22% | — |
Volatility
AGIQ vs. FAI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGIQ | FAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.79% | 29.24% | -5.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 31.30% | -7.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 31.30% | -7.51% |
AGIQ vs. FAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGIQ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FAI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGIQ vs. FAI - Dividend Comparison
AGIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF | 1.91% | 0.38% | 0.00% |
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGIQ and FAI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FAI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FAI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AGIQ.
AGIQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.
AGIQ tracks BITA US Agentic AI Select Index, while FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: SoFi and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AGIQ and 0.65% for FAI.
Find the right allocation for AGIQ and FAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer