AGIQ vs. DRGN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AGIQ (SoFi Agentic AI ETF) and DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds - AGIQ tracks the BITA US Agentic AI Select Index while DRGN tracks the BITA China Generative AI Select Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AGIQ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DRGN.

Performance

AGIQ vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGIQ achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 8.73% return.

AGIQ

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: -1.21%
• 6M: 6.78%
• YTD: 5.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

DRGN

• 1D: 3.34%
• 1M: -0.11%
• 6M: -2.24%
• YTD: 8.73%
• 1Y: 34.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 36.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	$89.14K	$98.01K	$199.12K
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	$390.32K	$398.54K	$552.05K

AGIQ vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	5.61%	13.79%
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	8.73%	-0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AGIQ and DRGN is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

AGIQ vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AGIQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRGN

DRGN Risk / Return Rank: 37
DRGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
DRGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
DRGN Omega Ratio Rank: 35
DRGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DRGN Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AGIQ vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AGIQ	DRGN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.88	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.43	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.17	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.55	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.10	—

Drawdowns

AGIQ vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGIQ drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum DRGN drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGIQ and DRGN.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGIQ	DRGN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.72%	-20.86%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.46%	-13.29%	+6.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.27%	-8.39%	+2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.42%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AGIQ	DRGN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.89%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.79%	36.63%	-12.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.79%	36.03%	-12.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.79%	36.03%	-12.24%

AGIQ vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGIQ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

AGIQ vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison

AGIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than DRGN's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	1.91%	0.38%
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	1.12%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGIQ and DRGN in my portfolio?

AGIQ and DRGN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AGIQ or DRGN?

On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AGIQ or DRGN?

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AGIQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AGIQ or DRGN?

AGIQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.12% for DRGN.

What is the main difference between AGIQ and DRGN?

AGIQ tracks BITA US Agentic AI Select Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: SoFi and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AGIQ and 0.39% for DRGN.