AGI vs. TIGR
AGI (Alamos Gold Inc.) and TIGR (UP Fintech Holding Limited) are both stocks. AGI operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while TIGR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, AGI returned 33.02%/yr vs -30.09%/yr for TIGR. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AGI vs. TIGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGI achieves a -8.58% return, which is significantly higher than TIGR's -50.10% return.
AGI
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -19.26%
- YTD
- -8.58%
- 6M
- -8.36%
- 1Y
- 28.45%
- 3Y*
- 42.45%
- 5Y*
- 33.02%
- 10Y*
- 17.27%
TIGR
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -28.16%
- YTD
- -50.10%
- 6M
- -48.38%
- 1Y
- -44.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- -30.09%
- 10Y*
- —
AGI vs. TIGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | -8.58% | 109.93% | 37.72% | 34.33% | 33.11% | -11.00% | 46.75% | 19.84% |
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Limited | -50.10% | 47.99% | 46.15% | 29.62% | -30.55% | -38.16% | 123.66% | -56.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGI and TIGR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019 | 0.12 |
The correlation between AGI and TIGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AGI:
$14.85B
TIGR:
$848.95M
AGI:
$2.52
TIGR:
$0.62
AGI:
13.99
TIGR:
7.75
AGI:
0.09
TIGR:
0.09
AGI:
7.19
TIGR:
1.37
AGI:
3.21
TIGR:
1.01
AGI:
$2.07B
TIGR:
$645.56M
AGI:
$1.22B
TIGR:
$533.82M
AGI:
$1.43B
TIGR:
$236.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGI vs. TIGR — Risk / Return Rank
AGI
TIGR
AGI vs. TIGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) and UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGI | TIGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.91 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | -0.68 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | -1.32 | +3.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGI vs. TIGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGI drawdown since its inception was -88.13%, smaller than the maximum TIGR drawdown of -93.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGI and TIGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGI | TIGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.13% | -93.65% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.29% | -66.44% | +26.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.29% | -66.44% | +26.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.29% | -92.04% | +51.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.25% | -87.01% | +50.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.73% | -77.92% | +40.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.05% | 33.97% | -19.92% |
Volatility
AGI vs. TIGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) is 17.80%, while UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) has a volatility of 35.17%. This indicates that AGI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGI | TIGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.80% | 35.17% | -17.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.01% | 48.45% | -5.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.64% | 67.06% | -15.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.39% | 82.74% | -41.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.44% | 90.54% | -42.10% |
Dividends
AGI vs. TIGR - Dividend Comparison
AGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while TIGR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.37% | 0.26% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.56% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 1.22% |
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AGI vs. TIGR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alamos Gold Inc. and UP Fintech Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AGI vs. TIGR - Profitability Comparison
AGI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 376.02M and revenue of 588.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.
TIGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 147.59M and revenue of 155.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.0%.
AGI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 337.66M and revenue of 588.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.4%.
TIGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported an operating income of 65.89M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.
AGI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 188.75M and revenue of 588.43M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.
TIGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a net income of -26.92M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in a net margin of -17.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AGI and TIGR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIGR has higher volatility (35.17%) compared to AGI (17.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGI dropped -88.13% vs TIGR's -93.65%.
AGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGI and TIGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer