PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGI.TO vs. SAABY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AGI.TO vs. SAABY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO) and Saab AB (publ) (SAABY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AGI.TO is traded in CAD, while SAABY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SAABY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGI.TO achieves a -7.00% return, which is significantly lower than SAABY's -2.65% return.


AGI.TO

1D
2.20%
1M
-17.41%
YTD
-7.00%
6M
-6.98%
1Y
31.91%
3Y*
44.75%
5Y*
36.71%
10Y*
18.20%

SAABY

1D
-3.52%
1M
6.79%
YTD
-2.65%
6M
2.43%
1Y
18.03%
3Y*
62.40%
5Y*
55.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGI.TO vs. SAABY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AGI.TO
Alamos Gold Inc.
-7.00%100.53%49.72%31.24%42.36%-11.61%18.10%
SAABY
Saab AB (publ)
-2.65%164.89%51.70%43.57%77.88%-48.82%67.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AGI.TO and SAABY is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2020

0.11

The correlation between AGI.TO and SAABY shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AGI.TO:

CA$20.75B

SAABY:

$29.87B

EPS

AGI.TO:

$2.52

SAABY:

SEK 5.98

PE Ratio

AGI.TO:

13.99

SAABY:

43.63

PEG Ratio

AGI.TO:

0.09

SAABY:

1.33

PS Ratio

AGI.TO:

7.19

SAABY:

3.43

PB Ratio

AGI.TO:

3.22

SAABY:

6.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGI.TO:

$2.07B

SAABY:

SEK 82.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGI.TO:

$1.22B

SAABY:

SEK 17.87B

EBITDA (TTM)

AGI.TO:

$1.43B

SAABY:

SEK 9.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGI.TO vs. SAABY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGI.TO
AGI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AGI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
AGI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SAABY
SAABY Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SAABY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAABY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAABY Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SAABY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAABY Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGI.TO vs. SAABY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO) and Saab AB (publ) (SAABY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGI.TOSAABYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.11

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

0.54

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.32

1.33

+0.99

AGI.TO vs. SAABY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the SAABY Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGI.TO and SAABY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGI.TO vs. SAABY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGI.TO drawdown since its inception was -82.90%, which is greater than SAABY's maximum drawdown of -55.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGI.TO and SAABY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGI.TOSAABYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.90%

-55.21%

-27.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.20%

-36.99%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.20%

-36.99%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.20%

-36.99%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.84%

-30.62%

-4.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.23%

-18.14%

-17.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.78%

14.89%

-1.11%

Volatility

AGI.TO vs. SAABY - Volatility Comparison

Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.49% compared to Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) at 15.46%. This indicates that AGI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAABY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGI.TOSAABYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.49%

15.46%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.60%

33.56%

+8.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.32%

48.36%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.36%

47.37%

-8.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.80%

57.72%

-10.92%

Dividends

AGI.TO vs. SAABY - Dividend Comparison

AGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than SAABY's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGI.TO
Alamos Gold Inc.
0.37%0.26%0.52%0.76%0.91%1.03%0.79%0.51%0.41%0.29%0.22%0.88%
SAABY
Saab AB (publ)
0.43%0.36%0.73%0.84%1.24%2.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AGI.TO vs. SAABY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alamos Gold Inc. and Saab AB (publ). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
586.92M
19.16B
(AGI.TO) Total Revenue
(SAABY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AGI.TO values in USD, SAABY values in SEK

AGI.TO vs. SAABY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alamos Gold Inc. and Saab AB (publ) over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
63.9%
23.4%
Portfolio components
AGI.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 375.05M and revenue of 586.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.

SAABY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported a gross profit of 4.48B and revenue of 19.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.

AGI.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 336.79M and revenue of 586.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.4%.

SAABY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported an operating income of 1.91B and revenue of 19.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

AGI.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 188.26M and revenue of 586.92M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.

SAABY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported a net income of 1.44B and revenue of 19.16B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AGI.TO and SAABY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGI.TO and SAABY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer