PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGGH vs. HYBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGGH vs. HYBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) and NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGGH achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than HYBI's 1.70% return.


AGGH

1D
0.25%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.73%
6M
1.07%
1Y
8.03%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
10Y*

HYBI

1D
0.13%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.70%
6M
2.21%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGGH vs. HYBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
0.73%8.23%-3.31%
HYBI
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF
1.70%6.97%-0.48%

Correlation

The correlation between AGGH and HYBI is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024

0.35

AGGH vs. HYBI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AGGH
HYBI

Financial Services

79.5%
11.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Financial Services

AGGH
79.5%
HYBI
11.8%

Basic Materials

AGGH

-

HYBI
1.8%

Communication Services

AGGH

-

HYBI
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AGGH

-

HYBI
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

AGGH

-

HYBI
4.9%

Energy

AGGH

-

HYBI
3.6%

Healthcare

AGGH

-

HYBI
8.5%

Industrials

AGGH

-

HYBI
8.3%

Real Estate

AGGH

-

HYBI
1.9%

Technology

AGGH

-

HYBI
35.6%

Utilities

AGGH

-

HYBI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGGH vs. HYBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGGH
AGGH Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AGGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGH Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGH Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

HYBI
HYBI Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HYBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYBI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HYBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGGH vs. HYBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) and NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGGHHYBIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.44

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

5.13

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

16.80

-9.22

AGGH vs. HYBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGGH Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the HYBI Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGGH and HYBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGGHHYBIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.28

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.99

-0.71

Drawdowns

AGGH vs. HYBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGGH drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, which is greater than HYBI's maximum drawdown of -4.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGH and HYBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGGHHYBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-4.68%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-1.43%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.11%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-0.62%

-3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.44%

+0.62%

Volatility

AGGH vs. HYBI - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) at 0.98%. This indicates that AGGH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGGHHYBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

0.98%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.33%

2.13%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.11%

3.22%

+3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.45%

4.93%

+3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.45%

4.93%

+3.52%

AGGH vs. HYBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGGH has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than HYBI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGGH vs. HYBI - Dividend Comparison

AGGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, less than HYBI's 8.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
7.51%7.54%8.97%9.51%2.11%
HYBI
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF
8.36%8.48%2.21%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGGH and HYBI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGGH has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to HYBI (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGGH dropped -13.26% vs HYBI's -4.68%.

On 1-year performance, AGGH leads with 8.03% vs 7.29% for HYBI. On fees, AGGH is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, HYBI has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AGGH has performed better with a 8.03% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGGH is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HYBI.

HYBI has the higher dividend yield at 8.36%, compared with 7.51% for AGGH.

AGGH is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while HYBI is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AGGH and 0.68% for HYBI.

HYBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGGH and HYBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer