AGGH vs. BIV
AGGH (Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF) and BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. AGGH is actively managed, while BIV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AGGH returned 4.86%/yr vs 4.34%/yr for BIV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AGGH charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BIV.
Performance
AGGH vs. BIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGGH achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly higher than BIV's -0.11% return.
AGGH
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 8.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
AGGH vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.73% | 8.23% | 1.97% | 8.47% | -8.47% |
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | -0.11% | 8.52% | 1.57% | 6.07% | -9.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGGH and BIV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2022 | 0.75 |
The correlation between AGGH and BIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGGH vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank
AGGH
BIV
AGGH vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGGH | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 1.37 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | 4.13 | +3.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGGH | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.08 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.65 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
AGGH vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGGH drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGH and BIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGGH | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -18.95% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | -3.18% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.67% | -6.07% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -1.91% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.45% | -3.39% | -1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 1.05% | +0.01% |
Volatility
AGGH vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) at 1.36%. This indicates that AGGH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGGH | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.55% | 1.36% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.33% | 2.90% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.11% | 4.06% | +3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.45% | 6.40% | +2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.45% | 5.50% | +2.95% |
AGGH vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGGH has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGGH vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison
AGGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than BIV's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 7.51% | 7.54% | 8.97% | 9.51% | 2.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | 4.21% | 4.01% | 3.79% | 3.09% | 2.41% | 3.42% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 3.01% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGGH and BIV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGGH has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to BIV (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGGH dropped -13.26% vs BIV's -18.95%.
On 3-year performance, AGGH leads with 4.86% vs 4.34% for BIV. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AGGH has performed better with a 4.86% return vs 4.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AGGH.
AGGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.51%, compared with 4.21% for BIV.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AGGH and 0.03% for BIV.
AGGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGGH and BIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer