PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGGG.L vs. GLAU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGGG.L vs. GLAU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGGG.L achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than GLAU.L's 0.41% return.


AGGG.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
0.59%
1Y
2.33%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
-1.74%
10Y*

GLAU.L

1D
0.25%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.72%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGGG.L vs. GLAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AGGG.L
iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist
-0.28%8.06%-1.44%5.27%-15.93%-5.32%9.37%6.85%0.43%
GLAU.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged
0.41%4.62%3.58%6.07%-11.13%-1.01%5.46%7.95%1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between AGGG.L and GLAU.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018

0.34

Over the past year, AGGG.L and GLAU.L have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGGG.L vs. GLAU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGGG.L
AGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

GLAU.L
GLAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GLAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGGG.L vs. GLAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGGG.LGLAU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.23

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

1.95

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

5.07

-3.40

AGGG.L vs. GLAU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGGG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the GLAU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGGG.L and GLAU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGGG.LGLAU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

1.28

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

0.24

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.83

-0.78

Drawdowns

AGGG.L vs. GLAU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.91%, which is greater than GLAU.L's maximum drawdown of -14.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGG.L and GLAU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGGG.LGLAU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.91%

-14.72%

-11.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.48%

-2.36%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.20%

-3.11%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.24%

-14.58%

-9.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.01%

-1.01%

-10.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-3.48%

-6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

0.84%

+0.48%

Volatility

AGGG.L vs. GLAU.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.74% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) at 1.56%. This indicates that AGGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLAU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGGG.LGLAU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

1.56%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.91%

2.72%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.10%

3.61%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

6.86%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.32%

7.03%

-0.71%

AGGG.L vs. GLAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AGGG.L and GLAU.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AGGG.L vs. GLAU.L - Dividend Comparison

AGGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, which matches GLAU.L's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AGGG.L
iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist
3.16%2.97%2.74%2.01%1.55%1.33%1.46%1.62%0.96%
GLAU.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged
3.15%3.02%2.71%2.02%1.40%1.21%1.51%1.25%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGGG.L and GLAU.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGGG.L and GLAU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

AGGG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while GLAU.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGGG.L and GLAU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer