AGG vs. XOM
AGG (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) is Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, AGG returned 1.52%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for XOM. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
AGG vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGG achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 27.80% return. Over the past 10 years, AGG has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of 1.52%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.04% annualized return.
AGG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.52%
XOM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 27.80%
- 6M
- 32.61%
- 1Y
- 50.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
AGG vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.08% | 7.19% | 1.31% | 5.65% | -13.02% | -1.77% | 7.48% | 8.46% | 0.09% | 3.55% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 27.80% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGG and XOM is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2003 | -0.15 |
The correlation between AGG and XOM shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.07 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGG vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
AGG
XOM
AGG vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 3.21 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | 8.97 | -3.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 2.07 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.90 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.36 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.48 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
AGG vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGG drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, smaller than the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGG and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.43% | -62.40% | +43.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -15.69% | +12.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.11% | -18.92% | +12.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.82% | -20.51% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.43% | -61.34% | +42.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -10.90% | +8.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -10.20% | +7.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 5.61% | -4.69% |
Volatility
AGG vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) is 1.29%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that AGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.29% | 9.20% | -7.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 20.29% | -17.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80% | 24.44% | -20.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.09% | 26.73% | -20.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.41% | 28.19% | -22.78% |
Dividends
AGG vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than XOM's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.00% | 3.89% | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.72% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.69% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGG and XOM have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to AGG (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGG dropped -18.43% vs XOM's -62.40%.
XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGG and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer