AGG vs. SWDA.L
AGG (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - AGG is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AGG returned 1.54%/yr vs 12.85%/yr for SWDA.L. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. AGG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SWDA.L.
Performance
AGG vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AGG is traded in USD, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGG achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, AGG has underperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 1.54%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.
AGG
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
SWDA.L
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 9.13%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 20.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
AGG vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.08% | 7.19% | 1.31% | 5.65% | -13.02% | -1.77% | 7.48% | 8.46% | 0.09% | 3.55% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.27% | 21.14% | 19.09% | 23.79% | -18.13% | 22.52% | 15.68% | 27.97% | -9.23% | 22.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGG and SWDA.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009 | -0.02 |
The correlation between AGG and SWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGG vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
AGG
SWDA.L
AGG vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGG | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.37 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.78 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.89 | 12.24 | -7.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGG | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.08 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.76 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.82 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.43 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
AGG vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGG drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -45.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGG and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGG | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.43% | -45.69% | +27.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -8.59% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.11% | -17.07% | +10.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.82% | -26.50% | +8.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.43% | -33.61% | +15.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -1.82% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -11.22% | +8.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 1.96% | -1.05% |
Volatility
AGG vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) is 1.31%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that AGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGG | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 2.78% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | 8.72% | -5.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84% | 11.50% | -7.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.09% | 15.32% | -9.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.41% | 15.83% | -10.42% |
AGG vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AGG vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, while SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.00% | 3.89% | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.72% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGG and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.
AGG is categorized as Total Bond Market, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for AGG and 0.20% for SWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for AGG and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer