AGG vs. HMC
AGG (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) is Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while HMC (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, AGG returned 1.52%/yr vs 3.28%/yr for HMC. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
AGG vs. HMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGG achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly higher than HMC's -8.51% return. Over the past 10 years, AGG has underperformed HMC with an annualized return of 1.52%, while HMC has yielded a comparatively higher 3.28% annualized return.
AGG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.52%
HMC
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 10.04%
- YTD
- -8.51%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- 1Y
- -5.83%
- 3Y*
- -1.40%
- 5Y*
- -0.78%
- 10Y*
- 3.28%
AGG vs. HMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.08% | 7.19% | 1.31% | 5.65% | -13.02% | -1.77% | 7.48% | 8.46% | 0.09% | 3.55% |
HMC Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | -8.51% | 8.04% | -5.14% | 39.86% | -16.69% | 3.61% | 2.88% | 10.34% | -20.81% | 20.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGG and HMC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2003 | -0.08 |
The correlation between AGG and HMC shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGG vs. HMC — Risk / Return Rank
AGG
HMC
AGG vs. HMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGG | HMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.99 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | -0.19 | +1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | -0.38 | +5.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGG | HMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | -0.19 | +1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | -0.03 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.13 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.17 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
AGG vs. HMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGG drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, smaller than the maximum HMC drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGG and HMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGG | HMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.43% | -90.46% | +72.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -31.18% | +28.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.11% | -35.41% | +29.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.82% | -35.41% | +17.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.43% | -43.12% | +24.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -23.09% | +20.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -36.10% | +33.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 15.43% | -14.51% |
Volatility
AGG vs. HMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) is 1.29%, while Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that AGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGG | HMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.29% | 10.95% | -9.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 21.03% | -18.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80% | 30.17% | -26.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.09% | 26.89% | -20.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.41% | 25.45% | -20.04% |
Dividends
AGG vs. HMC - Dividend Comparison
AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than HMC's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.00% | 3.89% | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.72% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
HMC Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | 2.53% | 4.67% | 3.19% | 3.29% | 4.00% | 3.08% | 2.72% | 2.90% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.87% | 2.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGG and HMC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HMC has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to AGG (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGG dropped -18.43% vs HMC's -90.46%.
AGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGG and HMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer