PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGG vs. AMID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGG vs. AMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGG achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than AMID's 7.01% return.


AGG

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.43%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.93%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
0.06%
10Y*
1.57%

AMID

1D
0.46%
1M
3.18%
YTD
7.01%
6M
4.94%
1Y
9.85%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGG vs. AMID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.52%7.19%1.31%5.65%-4.88%
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
7.01%-1.39%13.06%31.26%-7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AGG and AMID is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2022

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGG vs. AMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

AMID
AMID Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMID Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMID Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGG vs. AMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGGAMIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.11

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

0.80

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.82

2.78

+2.04

AGG vs. AMID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the AMID Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGG and AMID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGG vs. AMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGG drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, smaller than the maximum AMID drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGG and AMID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGGAMIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.43%

-23.32%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-12.31%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-23.32%

+17.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-3.91%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.71%

-6.19%

+3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

3.56%

-2.62%

Volatility

AGG vs. AMID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) is 1.37%, while Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that AGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGGAMIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

5.84%

-4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

12.80%

-9.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

16.59%

-12.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.09%

19.17%

-13.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.41%

19.17%

-13.76%

AGG vs. AMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than AMID's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGG vs. AMID - Dividend Comparison

AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than AMID's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.98%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
0.33%0.36%0.33%0.43%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGG and AMID have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMID has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to AGG (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGG dropped -18.43% vs AMID's -23.32%.

On 3-year performance, AMID leads with 11.79% vs 4.19% for AGG. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, AGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AMID has performed better with a 11.79% return vs 4.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for AMID.

AGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 0.33% for AMID.

AGG is categorized as Total Bond Market, while AMID is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Argent. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for AGG and 0.52% for AMID.

AGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGG and AMID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer