PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGF-B.TO vs. KT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AGF-B.TO vs. KT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in AGF Management Ltd (AGF-B.TO) and KT Corporation (KT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AGF-B.TO is traded in CAD, while KT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGF-B.TO achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than KT's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, AGF-B.TO has outperformed KT with an annualized return of 19.54%, while KT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.91% annualized return.


AGF-B.TO

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.94%
YTD
11.62%
6M
19.55%
1Y
53.34%
3Y*
40.76%
5Y*
24.44%
10Y*
19.54%

KT

1D
1.28%
1M
-9.85%
YTD
1.26%
6M
3.29%
1Y
-1.22%
3Y*
24.35%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
6.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGF-B.TO vs. KT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGF-B.TO
AGF Management Ltd
11.62%59.26%45.89%15.54%-10.40%43.95%1.07%41.60%-38.19%36.77%
KT
KT Corporation
1.26%21.90%30.09%2.51%20.52%20.94%-7.34%-21.79%-1.25%3.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AGF-B.TO and KT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AGF-B.TO:

CA$1.18B

KT:

$10.39B

EPS

AGF-B.TO:

CA$1.73

KT:

$3.14K

PE Ratio

AGF-B.TO:

10.35

KT:

0.01

PEG Ratio

AGF-B.TO:

0.27

KT:

0.00

PS Ratio

AGF-B.TO:

2.13

KT:

0.00

PB Ratio

AGF-B.TO:

0.98

KT:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGF-B.TO:

CA$561.40M

KT:

$28.39T

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGF-B.TO:

CA$342.49M

KT:

$15.90T

EBITDA (TTM)

AGF-B.TO:

CA$163.56M

KT:

$5.41T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGF-B.TO vs. KT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGF-B.TO
AGF-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AGF-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

KT
KT Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
KT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
KT Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
KT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
KT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGF-B.TO vs. KT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGF Management Ltd (AGF-B.TO) and KT Corporation (KT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGF-B.TOKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.01

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

-0.05

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

-0.12

+6.15

AGF-B.TO vs. KT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGF-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the KT Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGF-B.TO and KT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGF-B.TOKTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

-0.06

+1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.59

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.29

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.11

+0.04

Drawdowns

AGF-B.TO vs. KT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGF-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -85.07%, which is greater than KT's maximum drawdown of -58.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGF-B.TO and KT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGF-B.TOKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.07%

-58.56%

-26.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.57%

-26.68%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.57%

-26.68%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.90%

-26.68%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.63%

-58.53%

-7.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.00%

-21.75%

+8.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.83%

-23.42%

-26.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.88%

9.84%

-0.96%

Volatility

AGF-B.TO vs. KT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AGF Management Ltd (AGF-B.TO) is 6.99%, while KT Corporation (KT) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that AGF-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGF-B.TOKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

7.54%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.20%

16.66%

+10.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.86%

21.68%

+11.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.24%

23.15%

+6.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.84%

24.02%

+8.82%

Dividends

AGF-B.TO vs. KT - Dividend Comparison

AGF-B.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than KT's 3.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGF-B.TO
AGF Management Ltd
2.85%3.01%4.26%5.58%5.52%4.07%5.26%4.97%6.64%3.91%3.83%11.35%
KT
KT Corporation
3.34%4.24%3.50%5.29%5.40%6.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.49%1.84%

Financials

AGF-B.TO vs. KT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AGF Management Ltd and KT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00TJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
143.70M
6.98T
(AGF-B.TO) Total Revenue
(KT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AGF-B.TO values in CAD, KT values in USD

AGF-B.TO vs. KT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AGF Management Ltd and KT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
50.9%
32.7%
Portfolio components
AGF-B.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGF Management Ltd reported a gross profit of 73.16M and revenue of 143.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.

KT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.28T and revenue of 6.98T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

AGF-B.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGF Management Ltd reported an operating income of 33.41M and revenue of 143.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.3%.

KT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported an operating income of 492.09B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

AGF-B.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGF Management Ltd reported a net income of 18.04M and revenue of 143.70M, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.

KT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a net income of 399.91B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AGF-B.TO and KT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGF-B.TO and KT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer