PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGF-B.TO vs. AD-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AGF-B.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in AGF Management Ltd (AGF-B.TO) and Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGF-B.TO achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than AD-UN.TO's 15.79% return. Over the past 10 years, AGF-B.TO has outperformed AD-UN.TO with an annualized return of 19.05%, while AD-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.99% annualized return.


AGF-B.TO

1D
-0.58%
1M
8.47%
YTD
7.94%
6M
20.69%
1Y
47.54%
3Y*
41.47%
5Y*
23.16%
10Y*
19.05%

AD-UN.TO

1D
-1.06%
1M
5.17%
YTD
15.79%
6M
19.55%
1Y
35.94%
3Y*
24.59%
5Y*
15.77%
10Y*
5.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGF-B.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGF-B.TO
AGF Management Ltd
7.94%59.26%45.89%15.54%-10.40%43.95%1.07%41.60%-38.19%36.77%
AD-UN.TO
Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust
15.79%15.38%27.16%10.82%-7.62%33.79%-23.76%40.26%-9.96%-6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AGF-B.TO and AD-UN.TO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008

0.27

Over the past year, AGF-B.TO and AD-UN.TO have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AGF-B.TO:

CA$1.14B

AD-UN.TO:

CA$1.26B

EPS

AGF-B.TO:

CA$1.73

AD-UN.TO:

CA$2.23

PE Ratio

AGF-B.TO:

10.01

AD-UN.TO:

10.51

PEG Ratio

AGF-B.TO:

0.26

AD-UN.TO:

31.53

PS Ratio

AGF-B.TO:

2.06

AD-UN.TO:

5.17

PB Ratio

AGF-B.TO:

0.95

AD-UN.TO:

1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGF-B.TO:

CA$561.40M

AD-UN.TO:

CA$220.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGF-B.TO:

CA$342.49M

AD-UN.TO:

CA$197.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

AGF-B.TO:

CA$163.56M

AD-UN.TO:

CA$179.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGF-B.TO vs. AD-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGF-B.TO
AGF-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AGF-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

AD-UN.TO
AD-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AD-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AD-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AD-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AD-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AD-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGF-B.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGF Management Ltd (AGF-B.TO) and Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGF-B.TOAD-UN.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

2.04

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

2.83

-0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.36

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.83

-0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.49

10.68

-5.20

AGF-B.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGF-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the AD-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGF-B.TO and AD-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGF-B.TOAD-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

2.04

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.70

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.19

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.44

-0.16

Drawdowns

AGF-B.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGF-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.57%, which is greater than AD-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -74.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGF-B.TO and AD-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGF-B.TOAD-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.57%

-74.93%

-15.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.57%

-12.74%

-12.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.57%

-18.69%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.90%

-29.73%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.63%

-73.03%

+7.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.87%

-2.46%

-13.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.84%

-16.76%

-29.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.69%

3.37%

+5.32%

Volatility

AGF-B.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

AGF Management Ltd (AGF-B.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.95% compared to Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD-UN.TO) at 3.98%. This indicates that AGF-B.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AD-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGF-B.TOAD-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.95%

3.98%

+2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.95%

13.79%

+13.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.66%

17.70%

+14.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.20%

22.64%

+6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.83%

32.24%

+0.59%

Dividends

AGF-B.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

AGF-B.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than AD-UN.TO's 6.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AD-UN.TO
Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust
6.07%6.75%7.10%8.35%8.29%6.81%8.76%7.55%9.57%7.84%7.49%6.66%
AGF-B.TO
AGF Management Ltd
2.95%3.01%4.26%5.58%5.52%4.07%5.26%4.97%6.64%3.91%3.83%11.35%

Financials

AGF-B.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AGF Management Ltd and Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
143.70M
65.37M
(AGF-B.TO) Total Revenue
(AD-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

AGF-B.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AGF Management Ltd and Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
50.9%
89.3%
Portfolio components
AGF-B.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGF Management Ltd reported a gross profit of 73.16M and revenue of 143.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.

AD-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust reported a gross profit of 58.38M and revenue of 65.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.3%.

AGF-B.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGF Management Ltd reported an operating income of 33.41M and revenue of 143.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.3%.

AD-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust reported an operating income of 47.42M and revenue of 65.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 72.5%.

AGF-B.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGF Management Ltd reported a net income of 18.04M and revenue of 143.70M, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.

AD-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust reported a net income of 40.41M and revenue of 65.37M, resulting in a net margin of 61.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AGF-B.TO and AD-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGF-B.TO and AD-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer