AGDAX vs. AWF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AGDAX (AB High Income Fund) and AWF (AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds from AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, AGDAX returned 4.66%/yr vs 5.81%/yr for AWF. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AGDAX charges 0.84%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for AWF.

Performance

AGDAX vs. AWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB High Income Fund (AGDAX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGDAX achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than AWF's -1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, AGDAX has underperformed AWF with an annualized return of 4.66%, while AWF has yielded a comparatively higher 5.81% annualized return.

AGDAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 2.49%
• 1Y: 7.67%
• 3Y*: 9.01%
• 5Y*: 3.80%
• 10Y*: 4.66%

AWF

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: -1.70%
• 6M: -1.84%
• 1Y: 1.42%
• 3Y*: 8.89%
• 5Y*: 4.17%
• 10Y*: 5.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGDAX vs. AWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AGDAX AB High Income Fund	2.07%	8.06%	7.36%	13.63%	-12.45%	3.87%	2.91%	13.71%	-5.29%	7.94%
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	-1.70%	7.54%	14.30%	18.37%	-16.62%	9.95%	4.40%	23.40%	-11.35%	7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AGDAX and AWF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995	0.34

The correlation between AGDAX and AWF shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AGDAX vs. AWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGDAX

AGDAX Risk / Return Rank: 73
AGDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
AGDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
AGDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AGDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
AGDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

AWF

AWF Risk / Return Rank: 3
AWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Omega Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGDAX vs. AWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB High Income Fund (AGDAX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AGDAX	AWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	0.16	+2.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.23	0.29	+3.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.04	+0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	0.14	+2.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.01	0.33	+13.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AGDAX vs. AWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the AWF Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGDAX and AWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGDAX	AWF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	0.16	+2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.35	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.38	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.31	+0.57

Drawdowns

AGDAX vs. AWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGDAX drawdown since its inception was -45.59%, smaller than the maximum AWF drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGDAX and AWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGDAX	AWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.59%	-55.54%	+9.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.76%	-10.19%	+7.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.24%	-11.12%	+6.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.96%	-25.25%	+8.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.82%	-40.12%	+14.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.81%	+5.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.47%	-12.31%	+7.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.56%	4.26%	-3.70%

Volatility

AGDAX vs. AWF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB High Income Fund (AGDAX) is 0.98%, while AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that AGDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AGDAX	AWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.98%	3.53%	-2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.60%	7.25%	-4.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.31%	8.70%	-5.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.93%	12.11%	-7.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.65%	15.22%	-9.57%

AGDAX vs. AWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGDAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than AWF's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

AGDAX vs. AWF - Dividend Comparison

AGDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, less than AWF's 7.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGDAX AB High Income Fund	6.68%	6.85%	5.89%	6.53%	6.79%	4.95%	5.86%	6.27%	7.47%	5.84%	6.25%	7.42%
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	7.68%	7.81%	7.47%	7.33%	10.30%	6.48%	6.68%	6.62%	7.97%	6.03%	7.73%	10.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGDAX and AWF in my portfolio?

AGDAX and AWF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AGDAX or AWF?

AWF has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to AGDAX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGDAX dropped -45.59% vs AWF's -55.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AGDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.