AGCC.TO vs. MNS.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO).

AGCC.TO and MNS.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Oct 7, 2025. MNS.TO is a passively managed fund by Royal Canadian Mint that tracks the performance of the N/A (Physical Bullion). It was launched on Oct 29, 2012.

Performance

AGCC.TO vs. MNS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AGCC.TO vs. MNS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AGCC.TO Global X Silver Covered Call ETF	1.84%	37.24%
MNS.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves	-7.47%	53.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGCC.TO achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly higher than MNS.TO's -7.47% return.

AGCC.TO

• 1D: 6.26%
• 1M: -18.74%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MNS.TO

• 1D: 3.58%
• 1M: -19.21%
• YTD: -7.47%
• 6M: 41.80%
• 1Y: 105.96%
• 3Y*: 44.20%
• 5Y*: 25.15%
• 10Y*: 17.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGCC.TO vs. MNS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGCC.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MNS.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.

AGCC.TO

Global X Silver Covered Call ETF

MNS.TO

Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves

Return for Risk

AGCC.TO vs. MNS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNS.TO

MNS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 87
MNS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
MNS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
MNS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 90
MNS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
MNS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGCC.TO vs. MNS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGCC.TO	MNS.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.47	0.30	+1.17

Correlation

The correlation between AGCC.TO and MNS.TO is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AGCC.TO vs. MNS.TO - Dividend Comparison

AGCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while MNS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
AGCC.TO Global X Silver Covered Call ETF	3.06%	1.49%
MNS.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AGCC.TO vs. MNS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum MNS.TO drawdown of -51.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGCC.TO and MNS.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGCC.TO	MNS.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.17%	-51.12%	+11.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-38.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.50%	-31.29%	-1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.78%	-28.13%	+16.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AGCC.TO	MNS.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	51.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.54%	52.29%	+18.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.54%	33.79%	+36.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.54%	31.65%	+38.89%