PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGBP.L vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGBP.L vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (AGBP.L) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AGBP.L is traded in GBP, while AGG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AGG values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGBP.L achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than AGG's 0.82% return.


AGBP.L

1D
0.15%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.69%
1Y
3.40%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*

AGG

1D
0.00%
1M
1.09%
YTD
0.82%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
6.16%
3Y*
1.32%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
2.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGBP.L vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGBP.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.42%4.51%3.15%5.67%-12.35%-1.86%4.15%6.46%-0.09%-0.30%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.92%-0.44%3.08%0.37%-2.68%-0.84%4.32%4.33%6.03%-1.36%

Correlation

The correlation between AGBP.L and AGG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2017

0.29

The correlation between AGBP.L and AGG shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGBP.L vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGBP.L
AGBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
AGBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
AGBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGBP.L vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (AGBP.L) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGBP.LAGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.18

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.16

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

3.06

+0.73

AGBP.L vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGBP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGBP.L and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGBP.LAGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.00

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.14

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.51

-0.27

Drawdowns

AGBP.L vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGBP.L drawdown since its inception was -16.42%, smaller than the maximum AGG drawdown of -17.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGBP.L and AGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGBP.LAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

-17.60%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

-5.31%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

-8.64%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.91%

-14.70%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-9.62%

+7.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-7.11%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

2.01%

-1.19%

Volatility

AGBP.L vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (AGBP.L) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) have volatilities of 1.41% and 1.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGBP.LAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

1.40%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

4.74%

-1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

6.22%

-2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

8.61%

-3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

9.82%

-5.69%

AGBP.L vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGBP.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AGBP.L vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

AGBP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than AGG's 4.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGBP.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
3.12%3.00%2.59%1.97%1.56%1.27%1.53%1.65%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.00%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGBP.L and AGG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for AGBP.L.

AGBP.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while AGG is Total Bond Market. AGBP.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for AGBP.L and 0.03% for AGG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGBP.L and AGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer