AG vs. NICE
AG (First Majestic Silver Corp.) and NICE (NICE Ltd.) are both stocks. AG operates in Silver (Basic Materials), while NICE operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, AG returned -1.67%/yr vs 3.87%/yr for NICE. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AG vs. NICE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AG achieves a -9.68% return, which is significantly higher than NICE's -12.61% return. Over the past 10 years, AG has underperformed NICE with an annualized return of -1.67%, while NICE has yielded a comparatively higher 3.87% annualized return.
AG
- 1D
- -4.21%
- 1M
- -11.80%
- 6M
- -27.79%
- YTD
- -9.68%
- 1Y
- 89.46%
- 3Y*
- 33.31%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- -1.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.79%
NICE
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- 6M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -36.69%
- 3Y*
- -22.99%
- 5Y*
- -18.73%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $178.27M | $175.82M | $226.19M | |
NICE NICE Ltd. | $70.31M | $53.40M | $68.66M |
AG vs. NICE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | -9.68% | 204.32% | -10.47% | -25.99% | -24.73% | -17.24% | 9.62% | 108.15% | -12.61% | -11.66% |
NICE NICE Ltd. | -12.61% | -33.44% | -14.87% | 3.75% | -36.66% | 7.07% | 82.75% | 43.38% | 17.73% | 33.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between AG and NICE is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2010 | 0.11 |
The correlation between AG and NICE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AG:
$7.41B
NICE:
$5.79B
AG:
$0.70
NICE:
$8.52
AG:
21.51
NICE:
11.59
AG:
0.38
NICE:
0.35
AG:
4.54
NICE:
2.04
AG:
2.54
NICE:
1.63
AG:
$1.64B
NICE:
$3.01B
AG:
$863.95M
NICE:
$1.98B
AG:
$1.02B
NICE:
$841.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AG vs. NICE — Risk / Return Rank
AG
NICE
AG vs. NICE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) and NICE Ltd. (NICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AG | NICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.89 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | -0.79 | +2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.35 | -1.29 | +4.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AG vs. NICE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AG drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, roughly equal to the maximum NICE drawdown of -93.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AG and NICE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AG | NICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.20% | -93.23% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.00% | -46.64% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.00% | -68.21% | +15.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.28% | -73.60% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.82% | -73.60% | -7.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.00% | -68.64% | +15.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.08% | -35.33% | -23.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.79% | 28.66% | -1.87% |
Volatility
AG vs. NICE - Volatility Comparison
First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) has a higher volatility of 18.02% compared to NICE Ltd. (NICE) at 16.53%. This indicates that AG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AG | NICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.02% | 16.53% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.35% | 44.99% | +12.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.97% | 52.76% | +22.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.17% | 40.40% | +21.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.87% | 33.57% | +28.30% |
Dividends
AG vs. NICE - Dividend Comparison
AG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while NICE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | 0.24% | 0.12% | 0.33% | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NICE NICE Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.76% | 0.91% |
Financials
AG vs. NICE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Majestic Silver Corp. and NICE Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AG vs. NICE - Profitability Comparison
AG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 266.81M and revenue of 415.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.2%.
NICE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a gross profit of 493.46M and revenue of 766.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.4%.
AG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 197.54M and revenue of 415.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.5%.
NICE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NICE Ltd. reported an operating income of 126.41M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
AG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a net income of 109.43M and revenue of 415.50M, resulting in a net margin of 26.3%.
NICE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a net income of 46.69M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AG and NICE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AG has higher volatility (18.02%) compared to NICE (16.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AG dropped -90.20% vs NICE's -93.23%.
AG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AG and NICE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer