AFTY vs. YANG
AFTY (Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF) and YANG (Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - AFTY is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China A 50, while YANG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.66, they often move in opposite directions. AFTY charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for YANG.
Performance
AFTY vs. YANG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AFTY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YANG
- 1D
- 6.57%
- 1M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 18.42%
- 6M
- 23.43%
- 1Y
- -12.94%
- 3Y*
- -47.01%
- 5Y*
- -33.76%
- 10Y*
- -38.75%
AFTY vs. YANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.48% | -12.80% | -22.47% | -7.37% | 33.77% | 44.23% | -24.26% | 45.15% |
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 18.42% | -62.77% | -71.41% | 11.95% | -41.34% | 25.90% | -58.66% | -40.72% | 13.14% | -64.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFTY and YANG is -0.66, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015 | -0.66 |
The correlation between AFTY and YANG shifts across timeframes, from -0.66 (all time) to -0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFTY vs. YANG — Risk / Return Rank
AFTY
YANG
AFTY vs. YANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFTY | YANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.49 | — |
Drawdowns
AFTY vs. YANG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFTY | YANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -99.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -38.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -94.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -99.97% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -90.52% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 26.12% | — |
Volatility
AFTY vs. YANG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFTY | YANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 42.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 58.83% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 94.44% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 82.12% | — |
AFTY vs. YANG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than YANG's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFTY vs. YANG - Dividend Comparison
AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 7.96% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% |
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 3.45% | 4.03% | 9.42% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 1.54% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFTY and YANG have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFTY is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFTY is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for YANG.
YANG has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 0.00% for AFTY.
AFTY is categorized as China Equities, while YANG is Leveraged Equities. AFTY tracks FTSE China A 50, while YANG tracks FTSE China 50 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AFTY and 1.07% for YANG.
Find the right allocation for AFTY and YANG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer