AFTY vs. PTNQ
AFTY (Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF) and PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFTY is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China A 50, while PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFTY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PTNQ.
Performance
AFTY vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AFTY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTNQ
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.71%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 12.48%
- 1Y
- 33.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.87%
- 10Y*
- 16.24%
AFTY vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.48% | -12.80% | -22.47% | -7.37% | 33.77% | 44.23% | -24.26% | 45.15% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 14.10% | 7.18% | 15.47% | 34.65% | -16.00% | 13.16% | 29.38% | 24.00% | 8.51% | 32.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFTY and PTNQ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2015 | 0.32 |
The correlation between AFTY and PTNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AFTY vs. PTNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFTY
PTNQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
AFTY
PTNQ
Basic Materials
AFTY
PTNQ
Energy
AFTY
PTNQ
Technology
AFTY
PTNQ
Consumer Defensive
AFTY
PTNQ
Industrials
AFTY
PTNQ
Utilities
AFTY
PTNQ
Communication Services
AFTY
-
PTNQ
Consumer Cyclical
AFTY
-
PTNQ
Healthcare
AFTY
-
PTNQ
Real Estate
AFTY
-
PTNQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFTY vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank
AFTY
PTNQ
AFTY vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFTY | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.81 | — |
Drawdowns
AFTY vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFTY | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -28.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.20% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -5.69% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.46% | — |
Volatility
AFTY vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFTY | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 15.56% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 12.90% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 16.37% | — |
AFTY vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFTY vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison
AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 7.96% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.77% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFTY and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PTNQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PTNQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.
PTNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for AFTY.
AFTY is categorized as China Equities, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. AFTY tracks FTSE China A 50, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AFTY and 0.65% for PTNQ.
Find the right allocation for AFTY and PTNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer