AFTY vs. PTLC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC).

AFTY and PTLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AFTY is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the FTSE China A 50. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. PTLC is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 11, 2015. Both AFTY and PTLC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

AFTY vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AFTY vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	20.48%	-12.80%	-22.47%	-7.37%	33.77%	44.23%	-24.26%	45.15%
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF	-5.61%	5.10%	24.31%	16.78%	-8.62%	27.90%	-1.15%	17.58%	1.49%	21.41%

Returns By Period

AFTY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PTLC

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -6.19%
• YTD: -5.61%
• 6M: -3.19%
• 1Y: 3.04%
• 3Y*: 12.35%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: 10.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFTY vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PTLC's 0.60% expense ratio.

AFTY

Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF

PTLC

Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

Return for Risk

AFTY vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTLC

PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 19
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 18
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFTY vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFTY	PTLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.63	—

Correlation

The correlation between AFTY and PTLC is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AFTY vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison

AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.23%	2.08%	1.84%	1.48%	7.96%	1.85%	6.62%	1.19%	16.76%
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF	1.13%	1.06%	0.67%	1.18%	1.26%	0.73%	1.08%	1.10%	1.00%	0.97%	1.08%	0.42%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AFTY	PTLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-26.63%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.17%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-7.45%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.70%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AFTY	PTLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.15%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	11.60%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	11.80%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	13.17%	—