AFTY vs. DRAG
AFTY (Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF) and DRAG (Roundhill China Dragons ETF) are both China Equities funds. AFTY is passively managed, while DRAG is actively managed. AFTY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for DRAG.
Performance
AFTY vs. DRAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AFTY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRAG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFTY vs. DRAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% |
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF | 0.00% |
AFTY vs. DRAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFTY
DRAG
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
AFTY
DRAG
-
Basic Materials
AFTY
DRAG
-
Energy
AFTY
DRAG
-
Technology
AFTY
DRAG
Consumer Defensive
AFTY
DRAG
-
Industrials
AFTY
DRAG
-
Utilities
AFTY
DRAG
-
Communication Services
AFTY
-
DRAG
Consumer Cyclical
AFTY
-
DRAG
Healthcare
AFTY
-
DRAG
-
Real Estate
AFTY
-
DRAG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFTY vs. DRAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFTY vs. DRAG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFTY | DRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | 0.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
AFTY vs. DRAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFTY | DRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 0.00% | — |
AFTY vs. DRAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFTY vs. DRAG - Dividend Comparison
Neither AFTY nor DRAG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 7.96% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% |
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.
AFTY and DRAG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AFTY and 0.59% for DRAG.
Find the right allocation for AFTY and DRAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer