PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFTY vs. DRAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFTY vs. DRAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AFTY

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRAG

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFTY vs. DRAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


AFTY vs. DRAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AFTY
DRAG

Financial Services

50.4%

-

Basic Materials

15.5%

-

Energy

11.5%

-

Technology

7.4%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%

-

Industrials

4.7%

-

Utilities

4.4%

-

Communication Services

-

17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

72.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

AFTY
50.4%
DRAG

-

Basic Materials

AFTY
15.5%
DRAG

-

Energy

AFTY
11.5%
DRAG

-

Technology

AFTY
7.4%
DRAG
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

AFTY
6.1%
DRAG

-

Industrials

AFTY
4.7%
DRAG

-

Utilities

AFTY
4.4%
DRAG

-

Communication Services

AFTY

-

DRAG
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AFTY

-

DRAG
72.4%

Healthcare

AFTY

-

DRAG

-

Real Estate

AFTY

-

DRAG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFTY vs. DRAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFTY vs. DRAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFTY vs. DRAG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFTYDRAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

Volatility

AFTY vs. DRAG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFTYDRAGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

AFTY vs. DRAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFTY vs. DRAG - Dividend Comparison

Neither AFTY nor DRAG has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
0.00%0.00%2.23%2.08%1.84%1.48%7.96%1.85%6.62%1.19%16.76%
DRAG
Roundhill China Dragons ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.

AFTY and DRAG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AFTY and 0.59% for DRAG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFTY and DRAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer