PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFSM vs. VPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AFSM vs. VPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) and Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AFSM vs. VPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AFSM
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
0.06%9.99%10.55%22.23%-17.50%26.03%8.44%2.63%
VPC
Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF
-11.66%-6.75%10.52%22.20%-11.70%34.18%-9.50%1.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFSM achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly higher than VPC's -11.66% return.


AFSM

1D
3.20%
1M
-4.89%
YTD
0.06%
6M
0.77%
1Y
18.24%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*

VPC

1D
2.93%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-11.66%
6M
-12.28%
1Y
-16.52%
3Y*
2.20%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AFSM vs. VPC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFSM has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than VPC's 5.53% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AFSM vs. VPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFSM
AFSM Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
AFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VPC
VPC Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
VPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPC Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
VPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPC Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFSM vs. VPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) and Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFSMVPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

-1.00

+1.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

-1.30

+2.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.83

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

-0.74

+2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.76

-1.75

+7.52

AFSM vs. VPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the VPC Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFSM and VPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFSMVPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

-1.00

+1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.16

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.18

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between AFSM and VPC is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AFSM vs. VPC - Dividend Comparison

AFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than VPC's 17.77% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
AFSM
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
0.55%0.58%0.58%0.92%1.28%0.35%0.53%0.32%
VPC
Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF
17.77%14.33%11.26%11.71%10.74%6.31%10.06%8.19%

Drawdowns

AFSM vs. VPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFSM drawdown since its inception was -43.54%, smaller than the maximum VPC drawdown of -53.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFSM and VPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AFSMVPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.54%

-53.45%

+9.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-22.76%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

-24.86%

-3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.67%

-21.75%

+15.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-7.41%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

9.59%

-6.20%

Volatility

AFSM vs. VPC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC) at 5.51%. This indicates that AFSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AFSMVPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

5.51%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

10.48%

+2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.43%

16.60%

+4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.86%

13.39%

+7.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.57%

20.68%

+4.89%