AFSM vs. OILK
AFSM (First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFSM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. AFSM is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFSM returned 8.53%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFSM charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
AFSM vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFSM achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
AFSM
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 30.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
AFSM vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFSM First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF | 15.65% | 9.99% | 10.55% | 22.23% | -17.50% | 26.03% | 8.44% | 2.63% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFSM and OILK is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019 | 0.20 |
The correlation between AFSM and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AFSM vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFSM
OILK
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Technology
AFSM
OILK
-
Healthcare
AFSM
OILK
-
Industrials
AFSM
OILK
-
Financial Services
AFSM
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
AFSM
OILK
Energy
AFSM
OILK
-
Basic Materials
AFSM
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
AFSM
OILK
-
Real Estate
AFSM
OILK
-
Communication Services
AFSM
OILK
-
Utilities
AFSM
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFSM vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
AFSM
OILK
AFSM vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFSM | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 3.42 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.41 | 6.91 | +3.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFSM | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.06 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.59 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.12 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
AFSM vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFSM drawdown since its inception was -43.54%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFSM and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFSM | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.54% | -83.76% | +40.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -17.35% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.07% | -23.42% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.27% | -34.69% | +6.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -3.66% | +2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -32.61% | +23.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 8.56% | -5.66% |
Volatility
AFSM vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) is 5.57%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that AFSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFSM | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 10.44% | -4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 23.26% | -10.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.89% | 28.75% | -10.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 30.12% | -9.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 35.97% | -10.57% |
AFSM vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFSM has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFSM vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
AFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFSM First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.58% | 0.92% | 1.28% | 0.35% | 0.53% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFSM and OILK have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to AFSM (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFSM dropped -43.54% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 8.53% for AFSM. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, AFSM has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for AFSM.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.47% for AFSM.
AFSM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for AFSM and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFSM and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer