AFSC vs. SCHA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AFSC (abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. AFSC is actively managed, while SCHA is passively managed. Over the past year, AFSC returned 27.01% vs 40.27% for SCHA. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFSC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.

Performance

AFSC vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFSC achieves a 16.58% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 19.79% return.

AFSC

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 16.58%
• 6M: 13.48%
• 1Y: 27.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHA

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 19.79%
• 6M: 19.32%
• 1Y: 40.27%
• 3Y*: 18.92%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: 11.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFSC vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AFSC abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF	16.58%	2.67%
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF	19.79%	7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AFSC and SCHA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.91

The correlation between AFSC and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AFSC vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFSC

AFSC Risk / Return Rank: 47
AFSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
AFSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
AFSC Omega Ratio Rank: 38
AFSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
AFSC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

SCHA

SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 71
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFSC vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AFSC	SCHA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	2.25	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	3.16	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.38	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	4.26	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.96	15.66	-5.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AFSC vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFSC and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFSC	SCHA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	2.25	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.57	+0.09

Drawdowns

AFSC vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFSC drawdown since its inception was -21.68%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFSC and SCHA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFSC	SCHA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.68%	-42.41%	+20.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.29%	-9.50%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.79%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.79%	-0.58%	-1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-7.58%	+3.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	2.58%	+0.14%

Volatility

AFSC vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) at 5.08%. This indicates that AFSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFSC	SCHA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.49%	5.08%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.99%	12.83%	+1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.59%	18.01%	+0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.57%	21.93%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.57%	22.71%	-0.14%

AFSC vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFSC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFSC vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

AFSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SCHA's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFSC abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF	0.07%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF	1.00%	1.26%	1.51%	1.42%	1.37%	1.19%	1.05%	1.39%	1.58%	1.24%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFSC and SCHA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, AFSC and SCHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AFSC or SCHA?

AFSC has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to SCHA (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFSC dropped -21.68% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

Which ETF is better, AFSC or SCHA?

On 1-year performance, SCHA leads with 40.27% vs 27.01% for AFSC. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHA has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AFSC or SCHA?

Over the 1-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 40.27% return vs 27.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AFSC or SCHA?

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AFSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AFSC or SCHA?

SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.07% for AFSC.

What is the main difference between AFSC and SCHA?

They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for AFSC and 0.04% for SCHA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.