PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFRM vs. FLYW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AFRM vs. FLYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) and Flywire Corporation (FLYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFRM achieves a -11.10% return, which is significantly lower than FLYW's 3.88% return.


AFRM

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.16%
YTD
-11.10%
6M
-1.61%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
52.28%
5Y*
-0.54%
10Y*

FLYW

1D
-0.47%
1M
-7.08%
YTD
3.88%
6M
-0.41%
1Y
36.33%
3Y*
-23.28%
5Y*
-13.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFRM vs. FLYW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
-11.10%22.22%23.93%408.17%-90.38%86.08%
FLYW
Flywire Corporation
3.88%-31.33%-10.93%-5.39%-35.71%11.94%

Correlation

The correlation between AFRM and FLYW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.49

The correlation between AFRM and FLYW shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AFRM:

$23.03B

FLYW:

$1.88B

EPS

AFRM:

$1.10

FLYW:

$99.12

PE Ratio

AFRM:

60.05

FLYW:

0.15

PS Ratio

AFRM:

7.18

FLYW:

0.01

PB Ratio

AFRM:

6.09

FLYW:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

AFRM:

$3.20B

FLYW:

$188.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AFRM:

$2.00B

FLYW:

$299.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

AFRM:

$908.84M

FLYW:

$11.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFRM vs. FLYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFRM
AFRM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AFRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFRM Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AFRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFRM Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FLYW
FLYW Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FLYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYW Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYW Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFRM vs. FLYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) and Flywire Corporation (FLYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFRMFLYWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.19

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

1.30

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.31

3.39

-3.08

AFRM vs. FLYW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFRM Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the FLYW Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFRM and FLYW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFRM vs. FLYW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFRM drawdown since its inception was -94.71%, which is greater than FLYW's maximum drawdown of -84.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRM and FLYW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFRMFLYWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.71%

-84.40%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.86%

-28.16%

-25.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.85%

-75.98%

+20.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.71%

-84.40%

-10.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.73%

-72.74%

+12.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.65%

-56.06%

-12.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.04%

10.75%

+16.29%

Volatility

AFRM vs. FLYW - Volatility Comparison

Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) has a higher volatility of 17.80% compared to Flywire Corporation (FLYW) at 13.08%. This indicates that AFRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFRMFLYWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.80%

13.08%

+4.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.83%

36.78%

+7.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.85%

46.88%

+13.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

96.23%

57.22%

+39.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.46%

57.28%

+38.18%

Dividends

AFRM vs. FLYW - Dividend Comparison

Neither AFRM nor FLYW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AFRM vs. FLYW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Affirm Holdings, Inc. and Flywire Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
268.03M
188.11B
(AFRM) Total Revenue
(FLYW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AFRM vs. FLYW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Affirm Holdings, Inc. and Flywire Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
AFRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 268.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FLYW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flywire Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 188.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AFRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 88.43M and revenue of 268.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.

FLYW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flywire Corporation reported an operating income of 10.78B and revenue of 188.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

AFRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 102.90M and revenue of 268.03M, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.

FLYW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flywire Corporation reported a net income of 12.52B and revenue of 188.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AFRM and FLYW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFRM has higher volatility (17.80%) compared to FLYW (13.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFRM dropped -94.71% vs FLYW's -84.40%.

FLYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFRM and FLYW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer