AFRM vs. BLND
AFRM (Affirm Holdings, Inc.) and BLND (Blend Labs, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — AFRM in Information Technology Services, BLND in Software - Application. Over the past 3 years, AFRM returned 55.56%/yr vs 20.39%/yr for BLND. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AFRM vs. BLND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFRM achieves a -12.05% return, which is significantly higher than BLND's -43.75% return.
AFRM
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- -12.05%
- 6M
- -3.89%
- 1Y
- 11.10%
- 3Y*
- 55.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- —
BLND
- 1D
- 5.56%
- 1M
- 23.91%
- YTD
- -43.75%
- 6M
- -46.89%
- 1Y
- -54.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFRM vs. BLND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc. | -12.05% | 22.22% | 23.93% | 408.17% | -90.38% | 74.89% |
BLND Blend Labs, Inc. | -43.75% | -27.79% | 65.10% | 77.08% | -80.38% | -64.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFRM and BLND is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2021 | 0.44 |
The correlation between AFRM and BLND shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AFRM:
$22.79B
BLND:
$437.13M
AFRM:
$1.10
BLND:
-$0.04
AFRM:
7.10
BLND:
3.49
AFRM:
$3.20B
BLND:
$127.59M
AFRM:
$2.00B
BLND:
$95.50M
AFRM:
$908.84M
BLND:
-$16.09M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFRM vs. BLND — Risk / Return Rank
AFRM
BLND
AFRM vs. BLND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) and Blend Labs, Inc. (BLND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFRM | BLND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.88 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | -0.80 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.42 | -1.33 | +1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFRM | BLND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | -0.76 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | -0.48 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
AFRM vs. BLND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFRM drawdown since its inception was -94.71%, roughly equal to the maximum BLND drawdown of -97.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRM and BLND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFRM | BLND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.71% | -97.37% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.86% | -68.42% | +14.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.85% | -74.21% | +18.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.16% | -91.82% | +30.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.72% | -81.10% | +12.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.80% | 40.92% | -14.12% |
Volatility
AFRM vs. BLND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) is 17.96%, while Blend Labs, Inc. (BLND) has a volatility of 28.87%. This indicates that AFRM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFRM | BLND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.96% | 28.87% | -10.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.45% | 54.77% | -11.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.85% | 71.61% | -10.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.31% | 84.43% | +11.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.55% | 84.43% | +11.12% |
Dividends
AFRM vs. BLND - Dividend Comparison
Neither AFRM nor BLND has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AFRM vs. BLND - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Affirm Holdings, Inc. and Blend Labs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AFRM vs. BLND - Profitability Comparison
AFRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 268.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BLND - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blend Labs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 23.37M and revenue of 30.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.8%.
AFRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 88.43M and revenue of 268.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.
BLND - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blend Labs, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.06M and revenue of 30.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -16.4%.
AFRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 102.90M and revenue of 268.03M, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.
BLND - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blend Labs, Inc. reported a net income of -12.78M and revenue of 30.84M, resulting in a net margin of -41.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AFRM and BLND have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLND has higher volatility (28.87%) compared to AFRM (17.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFRM dropped -94.71% vs BLND's -97.37%.
AFRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFRM and BLND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer