PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFOS vs. ESN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFOS vs. ESN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFOS achieves a 32.24% return, which is significantly higher than ESN's 14.95% return.


AFOS

1D
0.15%
1M
7.26%
YTD
32.24%
6M
36.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ESN

1D
0.71%
1M
4.72%
YTD
14.95%
6M
15.15%
1Y
27.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFOS vs. ESN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
32.24%36.15%
ESN
Essential 40 Stock ETF
14.95%9.02%

Correlation

The correlation between AFOS and ESN is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFOS vs. ESN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFOS

ESN
ESN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ESN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ESN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESN Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFOS vs. ESN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFOS vs. ESN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFOSESNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.35

1.33

+3.01

Drawdowns

AFOS vs. ESN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFOS drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum ESN drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOS and ESN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFOSESNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-13.60%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.29%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-1.87%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

Volatility

AFOS vs. ESN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFOSESNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.14%

9.77%

+10.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.14%

13.29%

+6.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

13.29%

+6.85%

AFOS vs. ESN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFOS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ESN's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFOS vs. ESN - Dividend Comparison

AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than ESN's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.22%0.30%0.00%
ESN
Essential 40 Stock ETF
0.79%0.91%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFOS and ESN have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ESN.

ESN has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and KKM Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AFOS and 0.70% for ESN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFOS and ESN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer