PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFOCX vs. FZALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFOCX vs. FZALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Archer Focus Fund (AFOCX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AFOCX having a 10.52% return and FZALX slightly higher at 10.54%.


AFOCX

1D
0.43%
1M
3.94%
YTD
10.52%
6M
10.26%
1Y
15.74%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*

FZALX

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.44%
YTD
10.54%
6M
12.47%
1Y
31.53%
3Y*
25.73%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
16.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFOCX vs. FZALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AFOCX
Archer Focus Fund
10.52%0.73%29.35%14.14%-9.32%19.98%10.13%
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
10.54%27.07%26.13%26.63%-8.89%26.44%13.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AFOCX and FZALX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.86

The correlation between AFOCX and FZALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFOCX vs. FZALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFOCX
AFOCX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
AFOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
AFOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FZALX
FZALX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FZALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZALX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FZALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFOCX vs. FZALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer Focus Fund (AFOCX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFOCXFZALXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

2.71

-1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

3.72

-1.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.49

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

3.61

-1.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.76

16.39

-9.62

AFOCX vs. FZALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFOCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the FZALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFOCX and FZALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFOCXFZALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.71

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.99

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.86

-0.83

Drawdowns

AFOCX vs. FZALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFOCX drawdown since its inception was -91.26%, which is greater than FZALX's maximum drawdown of -35.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOCX and FZALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFOCXFZALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.26%

-35.23%

-56.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-8.99%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.26%

-18.49%

-72.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.26%

-23.25%

-68.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.67%

-0.32%

-88.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.68%

-3.78%

-18.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

1.98%

+0.47%

Volatility

AFOCX vs. FZALX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Archer Focus Fund (AFOCX) is 2.48%, while Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that AFOCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFOCXFZALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

2.73%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

9.06%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.16%

11.98%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

385.54%

16.70%

+368.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

340.66%

18.14%

+322.52%

AFOCX vs. FZALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFOCX has a 3.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FZALX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFOCX vs. FZALX - Dividend Comparison

AFOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than FZALX's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFOCX
Archer Focus Fund
2.48%2.63%22.61%1.65%6.64%9.74%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
3.65%4.04%2.83%2.17%4.51%4.92%8.14%13.19%21.94%16.56%2.12%4.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFOCX and FZALX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZALX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to AFOCX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFOCX dropped -91.26% vs FZALX's -35.23%.

FZALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFOCX and FZALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer