PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFNIX vs. QIACX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFNIX vs. QIACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AFNIX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QIACX

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.19%
YTD
6.94%
6M
8.29%
1Y
22.39%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
15.65%
10Y*
16.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFNIX vs. QIACX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFNIX
AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I
1.74%11.36%16.23%6.59%-8.77%25.23%6.60%25.71%-1.98%19.51%
QIACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund
6.94%21.15%31.07%23.52%-14.16%31.40%21.95%26.91%-2.64%21.07%

Correlation

The correlation between AFNIX and QIACX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.80

The correlation between AFNIX and QIACX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFNIX vs. QIACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFNIX

QIACX
QIACX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
QIACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIACX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QIACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIACX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFNIX vs. QIACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFNIX vs. QIACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFNIXQIACXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

Drawdowns

AFNIX vs. QIACX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFNIXQIACXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

Volatility

AFNIX vs. QIACX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFNIXQIACXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

AFNIX vs. QIACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFNIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than QIACX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFNIX vs. QIACX - Dividend Comparison

AFNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.18%, more than QIACX's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFNIX
AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I
31.18%14.13%6.88%3.43%4.61%1.78%1.75%2.13%2.04%1.72%1.79%2.66%
QIACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund
4.28%4.58%8.65%1.40%10.90%17.44%3.01%3.34%8.60%0.69%1.12%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFNIX and QIACX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFNIX and QIACX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer