AFLIX vs. FLBDX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AFLIX (Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund) and FLBDX (Meeder Tactical Income Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, AFLIX returned 2.92%/yr vs 3.22%/yr for FLBDX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFLIX charges 1.39%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for FLBDX.

Performance

AFLIX vs. FLBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund (AFLIX) and Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFLIX achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than FLBDX's 1.97% return.

AFLIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.31%
• 6M: 1.87%
• 1Y: 5.29%
• 3Y*: 6.05%
• 5Y*: 2.92%
• 10Y*: —

FLBDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 1.97%
• 6M: 2.28%
• 1Y: 7.73%
• 3Y*: 7.16%
• 5Y*: 3.22%
• 10Y*: 3.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFLIX vs. FLBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AFLIX Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund	1.31%	5.99%	5.51%	7.75%	-5.69%	1.66%	0.58%	1.56%	1.70%	1.85%
FLBDX Meeder Tactical Income Fund	1.97%	7.28%	6.64%	7.10%	-5.71%	-2.01%	7.46%	7.24%	-1.67%	0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AFLIX and FLBDX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017	0.25

Over the past year, AFLIX and FLBDX have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

AFLIX vs. FLBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFLIX

AFLIX Risk / Return Rank: 94
AFLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AFLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
AFLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
AFLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AFLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FLBDX

FLBDX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FLBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FLBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FLBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FLBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFLIX vs. FLBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund (AFLIX) and Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AFLIX	FLBDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.78	3.27	+0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.09	5.05	+1.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.05	1.70	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.11	4.69	-0.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.66	18.88	+0.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AFLIX vs. FLBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFLIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.78, which is comparable to the FLBDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFLIX and FLBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFLIX	FLBDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.78	3.27	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.48	1.21	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	0.99	+0.05

Drawdowns

AFLIX vs. FLBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFLIX drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, which is greater than FLBDX's maximum drawdown of -8.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFLIX and FLBDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFLIX	FLBDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-8.74%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.32%	-1.65%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.38%	-2.51%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.55%	-8.16%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-8.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.62%	-1.93%	+0.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	0.41%	-0.13%

Volatility

AFLIX vs. FLBDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund (AFLIX) is 0.54%, while Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) has a volatility of 0.75%. This indicates that AFLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFLIX	FLBDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.54%	0.75%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.17%	1.81%	-0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41%	2.38%	-0.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.98%	2.67%	-0.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.33%	2.94%	-0.61%

AFLIX vs. FLBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFLIX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FLBDX's 1.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFLIX vs. FLBDX - Dividend Comparison

AFLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than FLBDX's 4.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFLIX Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund	2.31%	3.15%	5.97%	5.31%	4.13%	2.40%	4.51%	2.88%	2.92%	1.34%	0.00%	0.00%
FLBDX Meeder Tactical Income Fund	4.58%	4.67%	4.35%	3.57%	1.68%	1.56%	1.81%	2.32%	2.03%	2.70%	2.90%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFLIX and FLBDX in my portfolio?

AFLIX and FLBDX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AFLIX or FLBDX?

FLBDX has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to AFLIX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFLIX dropped -9.43% vs FLBDX's -8.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AFLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 3.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.