AFLG vs. FTXL
AFLG (First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFLG returned 12.91%/yr vs 34.63%/yr for FTXL. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFLG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
AFLG vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFLG achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.
AFLG
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 24.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 30.59%
- YTD
- 115.70%
- 6M
- 113.17%
- 1Y
- 225.15%
- 3Y*
- 61.52%
- 5Y*
- 34.63%
- 10Y*
- —
AFLG vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 12.37% | 14.23% | 27.02% | 20.10% | -16.41% | 27.29% | 10.31% | 2.77% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 115.70% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | -33.88% | 36.04% | 46.08% | 9.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFLG and FTXL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019 | 0.74 |
The correlation between AFLG and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
AFLG vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFLG
FTXL
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
AFLG
FTXL
Consumer Cyclical
AFLG
FTXL
-
Communication Services
AFLG
FTXL
-
Financial Services
AFLG
FTXL
-
Industrials
AFLG
FTXL
Healthcare
AFLG
FTXL
-
Consumer Defensive
AFLG
FTXL
-
Utilities
AFLG
FTXL
-
Real Estate
AFLG
FTXL
-
Basic Materials
AFLG
FTXL
-
Energy
AFLG
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFLG vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
AFLG
FTXL
AFLG vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFLG | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.78 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 15.62 | -12.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.04 | 58.28 | -44.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFLG | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 6.33 | -4.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.97 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.94 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
AFLG vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFLG drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFLG and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFLG | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.84% | -43.87% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.19% | -14.51% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.49% | -41.57% | +24.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.48% | -43.87% | +20.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | 0.00% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -10.56% | +4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 3.88% | -2.10% |
Volatility
AFLG vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) is 2.86%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that AFLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFLG | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 14.28% | -11.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 28.98% | -20.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 35.94% | -24.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 36.02% | -20.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 34.25% | -15.05% |
AFLG vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFLG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFLG vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
AFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than FTXL's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 0.70% | 0.84% | 0.53% | 1.53% | 1.52% | 0.93% | 1.28% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFLG and FTXL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to AFLG (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFLG dropped -35.84% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 12.91% for AFLG. On fees, AFLG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AFLG has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 12.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AFLG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.
AFLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.12% for FTXL.
AFLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. AFLG tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AFLG and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFLG and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer