AFLG vs. AIRR
AFLG (First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFLG returned 12.91%/yr vs 25.40%/yr for AIRR. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFLG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
AFLG vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFLG achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.77% return.
AFLG
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 24.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 31.77%
- 6M
- 31.32%
- 1Y
- 65.82%
- 3Y*
- 37.10%
- 5Y*
- 25.40%
- 10Y*
- 21.89%
AFLG vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 12.37% | 14.23% | 27.02% | 20.10% | -16.41% | 27.29% | 10.31% | 2.77% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.77% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 31.43% | -2.08% | 33.01% | 17.17% | 1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFLG and AIRR is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019 | 0.77 |
The correlation between AFLG and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
AFLG vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFLG
AIRR
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Technology
AFLG
AIRR
Consumer Cyclical
AFLG
AIRR
-
Communication Services
AFLG
AIRR
-
Financial Services
AFLG
AIRR
Industrials
AFLG
AIRR
Healthcare
AFLG
AIRR
-
Consumer Defensive
AFLG
AIRR
-
Utilities
AFLG
AIRR
-
Real Estate
AFLG
AIRR
-
Basic Materials
AFLG
AIRR
-
Energy
AFLG
AIRR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFLG vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
AFLG
AIRR
AFLG vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFLG | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.41 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 5.05 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.04 | 18.68 | -4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFLG | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.61 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 1.01 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.67 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
AFLG vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFLG drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFLG and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFLG | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.84% | -42.37% | +6.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.19% | -13.09% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.49% | -27.95% | +10.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.48% | -27.95% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -1.86% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -7.43% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 3.53% | -1.75% |
Volatility
AFLG vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) is 2.86%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that AFLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFLG | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 7.87% | -5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 19.82% | -11.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 25.40% | -13.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 25.29% | -9.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 26.29% | -7.09% |
AFLG vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFLG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFLG vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
AFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 0.70% | 0.84% | 0.53% | 1.53% | 1.52% | 0.93% | 1.28% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFLG and AIRR have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIRR has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to AFLG (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFLG dropped -35.84% vs AIRR's -42.37%.
On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 25.40% vs 12.91% for AFLG. On fees, AFLG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AFLG has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 25.40% return vs 12.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AFLG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AIRR.
AFLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.
AFLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AIRR is Building & Construction. AFLG tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance (TR). Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AFLG and 0.70% for AIRR.
AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFLG and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer