PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFLG vs. ACSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFLG vs. ACSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AFLG having a 15.91% return and ACSI slightly higher at 16.30%.


AFLG

1D
1.69%
1M
4.69%
6M
12.82%
YTD
15.91%
1Y
23.44%
3Y*
21.94%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.26%

ACSI

1D
0.43%
1M
3.53%
6M
14.55%
YTD
16.30%
1Y
22.82%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$12.57K$22.39K$20.11K
$2.85M$2.89M$2.67M

AFLG vs. ACSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AFLG
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
15.91%14.23%27.02%20.10%-16.41%27.29%10.31%2.58%
ACSI
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
16.30%10.70%22.51%21.06%-20.93%23.33%22.93%3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between AFLG and ACSI is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019

0.87

The correlation between AFLG and ACSI shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AFLG vs. ACSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AFLG
ACSI

Technology

38.3%
12.5%

Financial Services

9.9%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
24.2%

Communication Services

9.1%
15.4%

Industrials

8.8%
7.3%

Healthcare

6.9%
8.5%

Energy

4.3%
3.4%

Utilities

3.8%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
12.4%

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Real Estate

2.5%

-

Technology

AFLG
38.3%
ACSI
12.5%

Financial Services

AFLG
9.9%
ACSI
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

AFLG
9.9%
ACSI
24.2%

Communication Services

AFLG
9.1%
ACSI
15.4%

Industrials

AFLG
8.8%
ACSI
7.3%

Healthcare

AFLG
6.9%
ACSI
8.5%

Energy

AFLG
4.3%
ACSI
3.4%

Utilities

AFLG
3.8%
ACSI
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

AFLG
3.3%
ACSI
12.4%

Basic Materials

AFLG
3.2%
ACSI

-

Real Estate

AFLG
2.5%
ACSI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFLG vs. ACSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AFLG
AFLG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AFLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFLG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AFLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFLG Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ACSI
ACSI Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ACSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ACSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACSI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AFLG vs. ACSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFLGACSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.95

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.36

11.32

+1.04

AFLG vs. ACSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFLG Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the ACSI Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFLG and ACSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFLG vs. ACSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFLG drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, roughly equal to the maximum ACSI drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFLG and ACSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFLGACSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.84%

-34.49%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.19%

-7.76%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.49%

-15.27%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.48%

-24.86%

+1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-5.31%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.02%

-0.12%

Volatility

AFLG vs. ACSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) is 3.18%, while American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that AFLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFLGACSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.71%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.49%

9.48%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

11.84%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

16.67%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

17.35%

+1.71%

AFLG vs. ACSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFLG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ACSI's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFLG vs. ACSI - Dividend Comparison

AFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than ACSI's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ACSI
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
0.78%0.91%0.69%1.01%0.81%0.31%0.82%1.64%1.59%1.20%0.18%
AFLG
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
0.69%0.84%0.53%1.53%1.52%0.93%1.28%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFLG and ACSI have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACSI has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to AFLG (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFLG dropped -35.84% vs ACSI's -34.49%.

On 5-year performance, AFLG leads with 12.78% vs 9.63% for ACSI. On fees, AFLG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AFLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AFLG has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AFLG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ACSI.

ACSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.69% for AFLG.

AFLG tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while ACSI tracks American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Exponential ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AFLG and 0.66% for ACSI.

AFLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFLG and ACSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer