AFLG vs. ACSI
AFLG (First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF) and ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - AFLG tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index while ACSI tracks the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFLG returned 12.91%/yr vs 9.12%/yr for ACSI. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFLG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for ACSI.
Performance
AFLG vs. ACSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFLG achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than ACSI's 9.66% return.
AFLG
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 24.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- —
ACSI
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 9.66%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- —
AFLG vs. ACSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 12.37% | 14.23% | 27.02% | 20.10% | -16.41% | 27.29% | 10.31% | 2.77% |
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 9.66% | 10.70% | 22.51% | 21.06% | -20.93% | 23.33% | 22.93% | 3.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFLG and ACSI is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between AFLG and ACSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
AFLG vs. ACSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFLG
ACSI
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Technology
AFLG
ACSI
Consumer Cyclical
AFLG
ACSI
Communication Services
AFLG
ACSI
Financial Services
AFLG
ACSI
Industrials
AFLG
ACSI
Healthcare
AFLG
ACSI
Consumer Defensive
AFLG
ACSI
Utilities
AFLG
ACSI
Real Estate
AFLG
ACSI
-
Basic Materials
AFLG
ACSI
-
Energy
AFLG
ACSI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFLG vs. ACSI — Risk / Return Rank
AFLG
ACSI
AFLG vs. ACSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFLG | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.29 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 2.42 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.04 | 9.45 | +4.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFLG | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.63 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.55 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.75 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
AFLG vs. ACSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFLG drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, roughly equal to the maximum ACSI drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFLG and ACSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFLG | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.84% | -34.49% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.19% | -7.76% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.49% | -15.27% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.48% | -24.86% | +1.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -2.38% | +1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -5.39% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.98% | -0.20% |
Volatility
AFLG vs. ACSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) is 2.86%, while American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that AFLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFLG | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 4.16% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 8.88% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 11.56% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 16.66% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 17.43% | +1.77% |
AFLG vs. ACSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFLG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ACSI's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFLG vs. ACSI - Dividend Comparison
AFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than ACSI's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 0.83% | 0.91% | 0.69% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.31% | 0.82% | 1.64% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 0.18% |
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 0.70% | 0.84% | 0.53% | 1.53% | 1.52% | 0.93% | 1.28% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFLG and ACSI have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACSI has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to AFLG (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFLG dropped -35.84% vs ACSI's -34.49%.
On 5-year performance, AFLG leads with 12.91% vs 9.12% for ACSI. On fees, AFLG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AFLG has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AFLG has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AFLG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ACSI.
ACSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.70% for AFLG.
AFLG tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while ACSI tracks American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Exponential ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AFLG and 0.66% for ACSI.
AFLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFLG and ACSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer