AFIF vs. BNDW
Compare and contrast key facts about Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW).
AFIF and BNDW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AFIF is an actively managed fund by Regents Park Funds. It was launched on Sep 18, 2018. BNDW is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. It was launched on Sep 4, 2018.
Performance
AFIF vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AFIF vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | -0.17% | 6.56% | 7.06% | 9.73% | -5.38% | -0.50% | 2.14% | 0.41% | -0.27% |
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | -0.03% | 5.02% | 2.42% | 7.18% | -12.88% | -2.10% | 6.22% | 8.37% | 1.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFIF achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly lower than BNDW's -0.03% return.
AFIF
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- 7.22%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
BNDW
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.20%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AFIF vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFIF has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AFIF vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank
AFIF
BNDW
AFIF vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFIF | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 1.00 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 1.40 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.18 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 1.34 | +1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.45 | 4.97 | +6.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFIF | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.00 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.04 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.37 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between AFIF and BNDW is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AFIF vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison
AFIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than BNDW's 4.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 3.70% | 3.52% | 5.61% | 5.91% | 3.49% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 2.54% | 0.69% |
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | 4.16% | 4.12% | 3.90% | 3.73% | 2.02% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 3.05% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
AFIF vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFIF drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, smaller than the maximum BNDW drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIF and BNDW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFIF | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -17.22% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.79% | -2.70% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.85% | -16.93% | +8.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -1.98% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -5.05% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 0.72% | -0.29% |
Volatility
AFIF vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) is 1.25%, while Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that AFIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AFIF | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 1.66% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.12% | 2.28% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53% | 3.53% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 5.17% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.32% | 4.92% | +1.40% |