AFBIX vs. UOPIX
AFBIX (Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund) and UOPIX (ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund) are both mutual funds - AFBIX is a Inverse Bonds fund managed by ProFunds, while UOPIX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, AFBIX returned -4.14%/yr vs 32.98%/yr for UOPIX. At a correlation of -0.57, they often move in opposite directions. AFBIX charges 1.78%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for UOPIX.
Performance
AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFBIX achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than UOPIX's 29.74% return. Over the past 10 years, AFBIX has underperformed UOPIX with an annualized return of -4.14%, while UOPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 32.98% annualized return.
AFBIX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- -3.66%
- 3Y*
- -4.63%
- 5Y*
- -2.05%
- 10Y*
- -4.14%
UOPIX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- 6M
- 27.07%
- YTD
- 29.74%
- 1Y
- 53.06%
- 3Y*
- 39.06%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- 32.98%
AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund | -1.42% | -5.24% | -3.07% | -6.30% | 8.01% | -4.55% | -6.63% | -12.62% | -0.42% | -4.51% |
UOPIX ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund | 29.74% | 30.26% | 41.75% | 115.97% | -60.70% | 48.28% | 86.57% | 80.53% | -9.41% | 68.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFBIX and UOPIX is -0.66, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006 | -0.57 |
The correlation between AFBIX and UOPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.66 to -0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFBIX vs. UOPIX — Risk / Return Rank
AFBIX
UOPIX
AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) and ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFBIX | UOPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.25 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.05 | 2.15 | -3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.77 | 7.05 | -8.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFBIX drawdown since its inception was -82.12%, smaller than the maximum UOPIX drawdown of -99.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFBIX and UOPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFBIX | UOPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.12% | -99.00% | +16.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.63% | -24.97% | +21.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.80% | -42.52% | +24.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.74% | -65.01% | +43.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.75% | -65.01% | +30.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.11% | -8.89% | -73.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.91% | -67.45% | +9.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 7.58% | -5.16% |
Volatility
AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) is 0.80%, while ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) has a volatility of 15.68%. This indicates that AFBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UOPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFBIX | UOPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | 15.68% | -14.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.15% | 30.63% | -27.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 37.13% | -33.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 45.89% | -38.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 44.44% | -36.55% |
AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFBIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than UOPIX's 1.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Dividend Comparison
AFBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UOPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UOPIX ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund | 14.08% | 18.27% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 5.64% | 11.03% | 9.78% | 5.78% | 6.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFBIX and UOPIX have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UOPIX has higher volatility (15.68%) compared to AFBIX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFBIX dropped -82.12% vs UOPIX's -99.00%.
UOPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFBIX and UOPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer