AFBIX vs. UOPIX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AFBIX (Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund) and UOPIX (ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund) are both mutual funds - AFBIX is a Inverse Bonds fund managed by ProFunds, while UOPIX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, AFBIX returned -4.39%/yr vs 34.74%/yr for UOPIX. At a correlation of -0.57, they often move in opposite directions. AFBIX charges 1.78%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for UOPIX.

Performance

AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) and ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFBIX achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than UOPIX's 29.15% return. Over the past 10 years, AFBIX has underperformed UOPIX with an annualized return of -4.39%, while UOPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 34.74% annualized return.

AFBIX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: -0.98%
• 6M: -0.91%
• 1Y: -3.44%
• 3Y*: -4.88%
• 5Y*: -1.98%
• 10Y*: -4.39%

UOPIX

• 1D: -6.59%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: 29.15%
• 6M: 24.98%
• 1Y: 61.70%
• 3Y*: 42.75%
• 5Y*: 19.97%
• 10Y*: 34.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund	-0.98%	-5.24%	-3.07%	-6.30%	8.01%	-4.55%	-6.63%	-12.62%	-0.42%	-4.51%
UOPIX ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund	29.15%	30.26%	41.75%	115.97%	-60.70%	48.28%	86.57%	80.53%	-9.41%	68.58%

Correlation

The correlation between AFBIX and UOPIX is -0.68, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006	-0.57

The correlation between AFBIX and UOPIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.68 (1 year) to -0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AFBIX vs. UOPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFBIX

AFBIX Risk / Return Rank: 0
AFBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
AFBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
AFBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
AFBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
AFBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

UOPIX

UOPIX Risk / Return Rank: 45
UOPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
UOPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
UOPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
UOPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
UOPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) and ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AFBIX	UOPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.95	1.86	-2.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.27	2.32	-3.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.31	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	2.68	-3.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.64	9.17	-10.81

AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFBIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the UOPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFBIX and UOPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFBIX drawdown since its inception was -82.07%, smaller than the maximum UOPIX drawdown of -99.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFBIX and UOPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFBIX	UOPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.07%	-99.00%	+16.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.69%	-24.97%	+21.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.55%	-42.52%	+24.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.51%	-65.01%	+43.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.55%	-65.01%	+28.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.03%	-9.31%	-72.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.84%	-67.58%	+9.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	7.28%	-4.84%

Volatility

AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) is 1.14%, while ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) has a volatility of 18.24%. This indicates that AFBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UOPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFBIX	UOPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.14%	18.24%	-17.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.13%	29.17%	-26.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.89%	36.01%	-32.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.29%	45.69%	-38.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.91%	44.40%	-36.49%

AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFBIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than UOPIX's 1.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFBIX vs. UOPIX - Dividend Comparison

AFBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UOPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UOPIX ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund	14.15%	18.27%	0.41%	0.00%	5.64%	11.03%	9.78%	5.78%	6.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFBIX and UOPIX in my portfolio?

AFBIX and UOPIX have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AFBIX or UOPIX?

UOPIX has higher volatility (18.24%) compared to AFBIX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFBIX dropped -82.07% vs UOPIX's -99.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UOPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.