AFBIX vs. BIPIX
AFBIX (Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund) and BIPIX (ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund) are both mutual funds - AFBIX is a Inverse Bonds fund managed by ProFunds, while BIPIX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, AFBIX returned -4.38%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for BIPIX. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. AFBIX charges 1.78%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for BIPIX.
Performance
AFBIX vs. BIPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFBIX achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than BIPIX's 20.18% return. Over the past 10 years, AFBIX has underperformed BIPIX with an annualized return of -4.38%, while BIPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
AFBIX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -1.34%
- 1Y
- -4.03%
- 3Y*
- -4.64%
- 5Y*
- -2.14%
- 10Y*
- -4.38%
BIPIX
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 20.18%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 111.16%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
AFBIX vs. BIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund | -1.16% | -5.24% | -3.07% | -6.30% | 8.01% | -4.55% | -6.63% | -12.62% | -0.42% | -4.51% |
BIPIX ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund | 20.18% | 47.99% | -25.91% | 9.55% | -13.43% | 5.00% | 19.94% | 23.65% | -12.15% | 34.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFBIX and BIPIX is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006 | -0.46 |
The correlation between AFBIX and BIPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.53 to -0.46 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFBIX vs. BIPIX — Risk / Return Rank
AFBIX
BIPIX
AFBIX vs. BIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) and ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFBIX | BIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.40 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.07 | 7.31 | -8.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.69 | 21.37 | -23.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFBIX vs. BIPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFBIX drawdown since its inception was -82.07%, roughly equal to the maximum BIPIX drawdown of -84.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFBIX and BIPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFBIX | BIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.07% | -84.51% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.89% | -15.15% | +11.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.55% | -59.50% | +41.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.51% | -63.86% | +42.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.55% | -63.86% | +27.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.06% | -3.72% | -78.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -37.17% | -20.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 5.18% | -2.32% |
Volatility
AFBIX vs. BIPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) is 1.28%, while ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX) has a volatility of 15.02%. This indicates that AFBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFBIX | BIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 15.02% | -13.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.14% | 31.47% | -28.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90% | 39.36% | -35.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 39.91% | -32.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.91% | 36.47% | -28.56% |
AFBIX vs. BIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFBIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than BIPIX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFBIX vs. BIPIX - Dividend Comparison
AFBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BIPIX ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.23% | 6.69% | 0.00% | 0.79% | 12.09% | 3.26% | 5.52% | 7.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFBIX and BIPIX have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIPIX has higher volatility (15.02%) compared to AFBIX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFBIX dropped -82.07% vs BIPIX's -84.51%.
BIPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFBIX and BIPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer