AFBIX vs. UJPIX
AFBIX (Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund) and UJPIX (ProFunds UltraJapan Fund) are both mutual funds - AFBIX is a Inverse Bonds fund managed by ProFunds, while UJPIX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, AFBIX returned -4.39%/yr vs 30.79%/yr for UJPIX. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.78% expense ratio.
Performance
AFBIX vs. UJPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFBIX achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than UJPIX's 79.83% return. Over the past 10 years, AFBIX has underperformed UJPIX with an annualized return of -4.39%, while UJPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 30.79% annualized return.
AFBIX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- -0.91%
- 1Y
- -3.44%
- 3Y*
- -4.88%
- 5Y*
- -1.98%
- 10Y*
- -4.39%
UJPIX
- 1D
- -10.78%
- 1M
- 17.17%
- YTD
- 79.83%
- 6M
- 80.02%
- 1Y
- 203.80%
- 3Y*
- 57.51%
- 5Y*
- 37.10%
- 10Y*
- 30.79%
AFBIX vs. UJPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund | -0.98% | -5.24% | -3.07% | -6.30% | 8.01% | -4.55% | -6.63% | -12.62% | -0.42% | -4.51% |
UJPIX ProFunds UltraJapan Fund | 79.83% | 60.72% | 28.67% | 70.81% | -21.63% | 6.44% | 23.36% | 40.42% | -25.61% | 39.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFBIX and UJPIX is -0.51, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006 | -0.43 |
The correlation between AFBIX and UJPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.51 to -0.43 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFBIX vs. UJPIX — Risk / Return Rank
AFBIX
UJPIX
AFBIX vs. UJPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) and ProFunds UltraJapan Fund (UJPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFBIX | UJPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.51 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 7.66 | -8.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | 25.51 | -27.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFBIX vs. UJPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFBIX drawdown since its inception was -82.07%, smaller than the maximum UJPIX drawdown of -89.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFBIX and UJPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFBIX | UJPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.07% | -89.83% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.69% | -27.11% | +23.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.55% | -43.92% | +26.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.51% | -43.92% | +22.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.55% | -56.99% | +20.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.03% | -10.78% | -71.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.84% | -49.83% | -8.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 8.13% | -5.69% |
Volatility
AFBIX vs. UJPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) is 1.14%, while ProFunds UltraJapan Fund (UJPIX) has a volatility of 24.51%. This indicates that AFBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UJPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFBIX | UJPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 24.51% | -23.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 42.51% | -39.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.89% | 52.90% | -49.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 42.97% | -35.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.91% | 41.47% | -33.56% |
AFBIX vs. UJPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AFBIX and UJPIX have an expense ratio of 1.78%.
Dividends
AFBIX vs. UJPIX - Dividend Comparison
AFBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UJPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UJPIX ProFunds UltraJapan Fund | 22.08% | 39.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFBIX and UJPIX have a correlation of -0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UJPIX has higher volatility (24.51%) compared to AFBIX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFBIX dropped -82.07% vs UJPIX's -89.83%.
UJPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.93 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFBIX and UJPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer