PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFAVX vs. FSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFAVX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund (AFAVX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFAVX achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than FSMDX's 14.95% return. Over the past 10 years, AFAVX has underperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 6.97%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.


AFAVX

1D
-0.53%
1M
2.33%
6M
1.62%
YTD
0.92%
1Y
-3.93%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
1.09%
10Y*
6.97%
ALL TIME*
7.92%

FSMDX

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.33%
6M
11.53%
YTD
14.95%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
14.95%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
11.45%
ALL TIME*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AFAVX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFAVX
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund
0.92%0.46%17.62%12.52%-16.21%7.79%-0.85%37.09%-3.81%10.96%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
14.95%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between AFAVX and FSMDX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.84

The correlation between AFAVX and FSMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFAVX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AFAVX
AFAVX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
AFAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
AFAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AFAVX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund (AFAVX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFAVXFSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.24

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

2.25

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.48

8.71

-9.19

AFAVX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFAVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFAVX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFAVX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFAVX drawdown since its inception was -40.83%, roughly equal to the maximum FSMDX drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFAVX and FSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFAVXFSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.83%

-40.35%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-8.16%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.03%

-20.92%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

-26.07%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.83%

-40.35%

-0.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.23%

-0.66%

-13.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-4.91%

-3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.68%

2.11%

+9.57%

Volatility

AFAVX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund (AFAVX) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) at 2.42%. This indicates that AFAVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFAVXFSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

2.42%

+2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.84%

10.22%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

13.71%

+4.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.16%

18.26%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

19.27%

-0.05%

AFAVX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFAVX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFAVX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

AFAVX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFAVX
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund
0.00%0.00%16.13%2.79%1.00%0.39%0.58%3.72%7.83%8.37%7.53%0.00%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.76%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFAVX and FSMDX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFAVX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to FSMDX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFAVX dropped -40.83% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

FSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFAVX and FSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer