AFAVX vs. DSMFX
AFAVX (AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund) and DSMFX (Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, AFAVX returned 0.89%/yr vs 8.84%/yr for DSMFX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFAVX charges 0.82%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for DSMFX.
Performance
AFAVX vs. DSMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFAVX achieves a -1.30% return, which is significantly lower than DSMFX's 18.17% return.
AFAVX
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 5.13%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- -1.30%
- 1Y
- -7.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- 6.87%
DSMFX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 18.17%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- —
AFAVX vs. DSMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFAVX AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund | -1.30% | 0.46% | 17.62% | 12.52% | -16.21% | 7.79% | -0.85% | 37.09% | -3.81% | 7.18% |
DSMFX Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund | 18.17% | 13.94% | 14.72% | 11.61% | -19.89% | 26.65% | 23.63% | 30.82% | -7.68% | 12.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFAVX and DSMFX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AFAVX and DSMFX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFAVX vs. DSMFX — Risk / Return Rank
AFAVX
DSMFX
AFAVX vs. DSMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund (AFAVX) and Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFAVX | DSMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.33 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 3.69 | -4.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | 14.10 | -14.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFAVX vs. DSMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFAVX drawdown since its inception was -40.83%, roughly equal to the maximum DSMFX drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFAVX and DSMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFAVX | DSMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.83% | -42.52% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.21% | -9.75% | -10.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.03% | -27.39% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | -30.72% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.11% | -3.92% | -12.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -8.67% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.32% | 2.52% | +8.80% |
Volatility
AFAVX vs. DSMFX - Volatility Comparison
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund (AFAVX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX) at 4.59%. This indicates that AFAVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFAVX | DSMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 4.59% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.56% | 14.22% | -4.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 18.42% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 21.06% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 21.84% | -2.64% |
AFAVX vs. DSMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFAVX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than DSMFX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFAVX vs. DSMFX - Dividend Comparison
AFAVX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DSMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFAVX AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.13% | 2.79% | 1.00% | 0.39% | 0.58% | 3.72% | 7.83% | 8.37% | 7.53% |
DSMFX Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund | 6.04% | 7.13% | 7.71% | 0.26% | 3.57% | 27.39% | 2.06% | 4.05% | 5.96% | 0.92% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFAVX and DSMFX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFAVX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to DSMFX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFAVX dropped -40.83% vs DSMFX's -42.52%.
DSMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFAVX and DSMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer