AETH vs. IMRA
AETH (Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF) and IMRA (Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Bitwise, while IMRA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Bitwise. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AETH returned -16.05% vs -32.66% for IMRA. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AETH charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for IMRA.
Performance
AETH vs. IMRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AETH achieves a -9.79% return, which is significantly lower than IMRA's 30.26% return.
AETH
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- -9.79%
- 6M
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -16.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMRA
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 30.26%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- -32.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AETH vs. IMRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AETH Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF | -9.79% | 35.38% |
IMRA Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 30.26% | -33.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between AETH and IMRA is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AETH vs. IMRA — Risk / Return Rank
AETH
IMRA
AETH vs. IMRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) and Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AETH | IMRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.94 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | -0.53 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | -0.86 | +0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AETH | IMRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | -0.55 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | -0.19 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
AETH vs. IMRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AETH drawdown since its inception was -47.78%, smaller than the maximum IMRA drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AETH and IMRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AETH | IMRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.78% | -61.55% | +13.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.98% | -61.55% | +17.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.85% | -40.71% | -3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.65% | -28.21% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.86% | 37.93% | -7.07% |
Volatility
AETH vs. IMRA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) is 4.02%, while Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) has a volatility of 9.53%. This indicates that AETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AETH | IMRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 9.53% | -5.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.18% | 43.61% | -16.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.03% | 59.89% | -14.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.68% | 61.39% | -6.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.68% | 61.39% | -6.71% |
AETH vs. IMRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
AETH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than IMRA's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
AETH vs. IMRA - Dividend Comparison
AETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than IMRA's 108.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AETH Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF | 2.67% | 2.41% | 14.73% | 6.64% |
IMRA Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 108.66% | 188.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AETH and IMRA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMRA has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to AETH (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AETH dropped -47.78% vs IMRA's -61.55%.
On 1-year performance, AETH leads with -16.05% vs -32.66% for IMRA. On fees, AETH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, AETH has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AETH has performed better with a -16.05% return vs -32.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AETH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for IMRA.
IMRA has the higher dividend yield at 108.66%, compared with 2.67% for AETH.
AETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IMRA is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AETH and 0.98% for IMRA.
AETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AETH and IMRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer