PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AETH vs. BITC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AETH vs. BITC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AETH vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AETH
Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF
-5.52%-0.11%31.76%37.65%
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
-0.39%-20.46%97.86%41.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AETH achieves a -5.52% return, which is significantly lower than BITC's -0.39% return.


AETH

1D
0.01%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
-5.52%
6M
-27.06%
1Y
27.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITC

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
-17.21%
1Y
-9.45%
3Y*
30.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AETH vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AETH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AETH vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AETH
AETH Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AETH Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
AETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
AETH Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AETH vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AETHBITCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

-0.36

+0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

-0.33

+1.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.95

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

-0.36

+1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.07

-0.58

+1.66

AETH vs. BITC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AETH Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the BITC Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AETH and BITC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AETHBITCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

-0.36

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.64

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between AETH and BITC is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AETH vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison

AETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than BITC's 3.38% yield.


TTM202520242023
AETH
Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF
2.55%2.41%14.73%6.64%
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.38%3.36%42.68%5.82%

Drawdowns

AETH vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AETH drawdown since its inception was -47.78%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AETH and BITC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AETHBITCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.78%

-38.51%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.40%

-26.51%

-14.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.19%

-31.54%

-9.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-15.81%

-7.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.81%

16.53%

+9.28%

Volatility

AETH vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) has a higher volatility of 18.61% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) at 12.07%. This indicates that AETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AETHBITCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.61%

12.07%

+6.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.66%

19.16%

+9.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.00%

26.66%

+24.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.15%

47.60%

+8.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.15%

47.60%

+8.55%