PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AETH vs. BFOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AETH vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AETH achieves a -9.79% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.39% return.


AETH

1D
-0.01%
1M
-4.98%
YTD
-9.79%
6M
-15.30%
1Y
-16.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFOC

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-7.39%
6M
-9.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AETH vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AETH and BFOC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AETH vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AETH
AETH Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
AETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
AETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
AETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
AETH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BFOC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AETH vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AETHBFOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.52

AETH vs. BFOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AETHBFOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

-1.88

+2.25

Drawdowns

AETH vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AETH drawdown since its inception was -47.78%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AETH and BFOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AETHBFOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.78%

-18.20%

-29.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.85%

-18.20%

-25.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.65%

-12.52%

-12.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.86%

Volatility

AETH vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AETHBFOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.03%

12.61%

+32.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.68%

12.61%

+42.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.68%

12.61%

+42.07%

AETH vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AETH and BFOC have an expense ratio of 0.90%.


Dividends

AETH vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

AETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
AETH
Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF
2.67%2.41%14.73%6.64%
BFOC
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AETH and BFOC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.90% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AETH and BFOC have the same expense ratio: 0.90% per year.

AETH has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.

AETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and First Trust.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AETH and BFOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer