AETH vs. BCDF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AETH (Bitwise Trendwise Ethereum and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AETH returned -34.66% vs 6.47% for BCDF. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AETH charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BCDF.

Performance

AETH vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Trendwise Ethereum and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF (AETH) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AETH achieves a -15.81% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 6.93% return.

AETH

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 4.00%
• 6M: -13.15%
• YTD: -15.81%
• 1Y: -34.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.72%

BCDF

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 6.12%
• 6M: 3.41%
• YTD: 6.93%
• 1Y: 6.47%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AETH Bitwise Trendwise Ethereum and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF	$27.84K	$19.14K	$18.72K
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	$17.03K	$19.91K	$42.03K

AETH vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AETH Bitwise Trendwise Ethereum and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF	-15.81%	-0.11%	31.76%	33.21%
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	6.93%	11.63%	14.87%	17.11%

Correlation

The correlation between AETH and BCDF is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.33

Return for Risk

AETH vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AETH

AETH Risk / Return Rank: 3
AETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
AETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
AETH Omega Ratio Rank: 2
AETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
AETH Martin Ratio Rank: 5

BCDF

BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 20
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 19
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AETH vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Trendwise Ethereum and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF (AETH) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AETH	BCDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.85	0.43	-1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.21	0.68	-1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.08	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.68	0.46	-1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.96	1.46	-2.42

AETH vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the BCDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AETH and BCDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AETH vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AETH drawdown since its inception was -51.08%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AETH and BCDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	AETH	BCDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.08%	-27.70%	-23.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.08%	-14.02%	-37.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.60%	-4.32%	-43.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.96%	-9.75%	-16.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.10%	4.46%	+31.64%

Volatility

AETH vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Trendwise Ethereum and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF (AETH) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) at 2.45%. This indicates that AETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AETH	BCDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.22%	2.45%	+8.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.81%	11.22%	+13.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.17%	15.10%	+26.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.64%	16.86%	+36.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.64%	16.86%	+36.78%

AETH vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AETH has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

AETH vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

AETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than BCDF's 2.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AETH Bitwise Trendwise Ethereum and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF	2.86%	2.41%	14.73%	6.64%	0.00%
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.36%	2.53%	1.63%	0.69%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AETH and BCDF in my portfolio?

AETH and BCDF have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AETH or BCDF?

AETH has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to BCDF (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AETH dropped -51.08% vs BCDF's -27.70%.

Which ETF is better, AETH or BCDF?

On 1-year performance, BCDF leads with 6.47% vs -34.66% for AETH. On fees, BCDF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BCDF has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AETH or BCDF?

Over the 1-year period, BCDF has performed better with a 6.47% return vs -34.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AETH or BCDF?

BCDF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for AETH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AETH or BCDF?

AETH has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.36% for BCDF.

What is the main difference between AETH and BCDF?

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for AETH and 0.85% for BCDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.