AEPGX vs. PNGAX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

AEPGX (American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A) and PNGAX (Putnam International Value Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AEPGX returned 8.78%/yr vs 10.25%/yr for PNGAX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AEPGX charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for PNGAX.

Performance

AEPGX vs. PNGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A (AEPGX) and Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEPGX achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than PNGAX's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, AEPGX has underperformed PNGAX with an annualized return of 8.78%, while PNGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return.

AEPGX

• 1D: 3.37%
• 1M: 3.32%
• YTD: 9.44%
• 6M: 11.59%
• 1Y: 24.88%
• 3Y*: 14.46%
• 5Y*: 3.35%
• 10Y*: 8.78%

PNGAX

• 1D: 2.34%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: 8.75%
• 6M: 10.27%
• 1Y: 21.88%
• 3Y*: 18.42%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: 10.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEPGX vs. PNGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AEPGX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A	9.44%	28.88%	2.63%	15.65%	-23.06%	-1.64%	24.80%	26.94%	-15.21%	30.74%
PNGAX Putnam International Value Fund	8.75%	34.66%	5.86%	18.50%	-6.85%	14.24%	4.19%	19.96%	-18.02%	24.09%

Correlation

The correlation between AEPGX and PNGAX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 1996	0.89

The correlation between AEPGX and PNGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AEPGX vs. PNGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEPGX

AEPGX Risk / Return Rank: 39
AEPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
AEPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
AEPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
AEPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
AEPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

PNGAX

PNGAX Risk / Return Rank: 39
PNGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PNGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
PNGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
PNGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
PNGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEPGX vs. PNGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A (AEPGX) and Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AEPGX	PNGAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.48	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.11	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.27	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	2.05	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.97	7.51	-0.54

AEPGX vs. PNGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the PNGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEPGX and PNGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AEPGX vs. PNGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEPGX drawdown since its inception was -53.98%, smaller than the maximum PNGAX drawdown of -64.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEPGX and PNGAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEPGX	PNGAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.98%	-64.78%	+10.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.56%	-10.51%	-2.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.75%	-13.87%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.53%	-27.37%	-10.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.50%	-41.58%	+3.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-1.37%	-1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.47%	-15.80%	+4.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	2.87%	+0.51%

Volatility

AEPGX vs. PNGAX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A (AEPGX) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) at 4.33%. This indicates that AEPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PNGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AEPGX	PNGAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.19%	4.33%	+2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.17%	11.87%	+2.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.43%	14.61%	+1.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.93%	15.82%	+1.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.02%	17.06%	-0.04%

AEPGX vs. PNGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEPGX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than PNGAX's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

AEPGX vs. PNGAX - Dividend Comparison

AEPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, more than PNGAX's 2.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AEPGX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A	10.00%	13.69%	4.56%	3.57%	1.72%	5.15%	0.17%	2.79%	6.33%	4.66%	1.24%	3.05%
PNGAX Putnam International Value Fund	2.73%	2.97%	3.89%	2.35%	1.63%	5.70%	1.84%	3.91%	4.34%	1.11%	2.23%	1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEPGX and PNGAX in my portfolio?

AEPGX and PNGAX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AEPGX or PNGAX?

AEPGX has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to PNGAX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEPGX dropped -53.98% vs PNGAX's -64.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PNGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.