AEMSX vs. THW
AEMSX (abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc) and THW (abrdn World Healthcare Fund) are both mutual funds - AEMSX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Aberdeen, while THW is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. Over the past 10 years, AEMSX returned 9.97%/yr vs 10.37%/yr for THW. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AEMSX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for THW.
Performance
AEMSX vs. THW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEMSX achieves a 26.96% return, which is significantly higher than THW's 6.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AEMSX having a 9.97% annualized return and THW not far ahead at 10.37%.
AEMSX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 26.96%
- 6M
- 27.50%
- 1Y
- 51.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
THW
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- 1Y
- 39.77%
- 3Y*
- 8.42%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
AEMSX vs. THW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEMSX abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc | 26.96% | 32.19% | 3.81% | 6.49% | -26.28% | 7.03% | 27.52% | 20.24% | -14.71% | 29.95% |
THW abrdn World Healthcare Fund | 6.46% | 31.10% | 5.35% | -11.52% | -1.21% | 12.03% | 26.40% | 32.98% | -5.40% | 16.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEMSX and THW is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2015 | 0.37 |
The correlation between AEMSX and THW shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEMSX vs. THW — Risk / Return Rank
AEMSX
THW
AEMSX vs. THW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc (AEMSX) and abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AEMSX | THW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.34 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 3.54 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.98 | 12.56 | +1.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AEMSX vs. THW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEMSX drawdown since its inception was -38.58%, roughly equal to the maximum THW drawdown of -37.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMSX and THW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEMSX | THW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.58% | -37.36% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.70% | -11.28% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | -28.26% | +9.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.65% | -31.53% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.58% | -37.36% | -1.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.40% | 0.00% | -5.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.54% | -9.67% | -2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 3.18% | +0.50% |
Volatility
AEMSX vs. THW - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc (AEMSX) has a higher volatility of 12.95% compared to abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) at 6.08%. This indicates that AEMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEMSX | THW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.95% | 6.08% | +6.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.24% | 13.29% | +6.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.22% | 20.15% | +2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 18.70% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 21.20% | -2.25% |
AEMSX vs. THW - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEMSX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than THW's 1.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
AEMSX vs. THW - Dividend Comparison
AEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than THW's 10.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEMSX abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc | 4.84% | 6.14% | 0.95% | 1.39% | 1.83% | 22.97% | 0.68% | 1.82% | 1.57% | 1.09% | 1.08% | 2.32% |
THW abrdn World Healthcare Fund | 10.88% | 10.96% | 12.72% | 12.00% | 9.56% | 8.60% | 8.85% | 10.11% | 12.08% | 10.29% | 10.91% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AEMSX and THW have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AEMSX has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to THW (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEMSX dropped -38.58% vs THW's -37.36%.
AEMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AEMSX and THW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer