PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEMSX vs. ABEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc (AEMSX) and abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AEMSX having a 33.25% return and ABEMX slightly higher at 33.29%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AEMSX having a 10.26% annualized return and ABEMX not far ahead at 10.41%.


AEMSX

1D
2.82%
1M
7.18%
YTD
33.25%
6M
34.79%
1Y
63.48%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
10.26%

ABEMX

1D
2.79%
1M
7.16%
YTD
33.29%
6M
34.81%
1Y
63.69%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEMSX
abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc
33.25%32.19%3.81%6.49%-26.28%7.03%27.52%20.24%-14.71%29.95%
ABEMX
abrdn Emerging Markets Fund
33.29%32.43%3.98%6.67%-26.23%7.15%27.65%20.42%-14.65%30.25%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMSX and ABEMX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

1.00

The correlation between AEMSX and ABEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEMSX vs. ABEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEMSX
AEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ABEMX
ABEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ABEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc (AEMSX) and abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEMSXABEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.55

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

4.61

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.19

17.28

-0.09

AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the ABEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEMSX and ABEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMSX drawdown since its inception was -38.58%, smaller than the maximum ABEMX drawdown of -54.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMSX and ABEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEMSXABEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.58%

-54.52%

+15.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-13.68%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-18.62%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.65%

-36.56%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.58%

-38.44%

-0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.18%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.55%

-13.08%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

3.65%

0.00%

Volatility

AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc (AEMSX) and abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) have volatilities of 11.67% and 11.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEMSXABEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.67%

11.65%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.42%

19.38%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.53%

21.49%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

19.21%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.93%

18.93%

0.00%

AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMSX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ABEMX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Dividend Comparison

AEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, which matches ABEMX's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABEMX
abrdn Emerging Markets Fund
4.58%6.11%0.99%1.42%1.82%22.95%0.68%1.85%1.57%1.32%1.23%2.47%
AEMSX
abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc
4.61%6.14%0.95%1.39%1.83%22.97%0.68%1.82%1.57%1.09%1.08%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, AEMSX and ABEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AEMSX has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to ABEMX (11.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEMSX dropped -38.58% vs ABEMX's -54.52%.

ABEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEMSX and ABEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer