AEMSX vs. ABEMX
AEMSX (abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc) and ABEMX (abrdn Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds from Aberdeen. Over the past 10 years, AEMSX returned 10.26%/yr vs 10.41%/yr for ABEMX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AEMSX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for ABEMX.
Performance
AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AEMSX having a 33.25% return and ABEMX slightly higher at 33.29%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AEMSX having a 10.26% annualized return and ABEMX not far ahead at 10.41%.
AEMSX
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 33.25%
- 6M
- 34.79%
- 1Y
- 63.48%
- 3Y*
- 21.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
ABEMX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- 7.16%
- YTD
- 33.29%
- 6M
- 34.81%
- 1Y
- 63.69%
- 3Y*
- 21.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEMSX abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc | 33.25% | 32.19% | 3.81% | 6.49% | -26.28% | 7.03% | 27.52% | 20.24% | -14.71% | 29.95% |
ABEMX abrdn Emerging Markets Fund | 33.29% | 32.43% | 3.98% | 6.67% | -26.23% | 7.15% | 27.65% | 20.42% | -14.65% | 30.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEMSX and ABEMX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009 | 1.00 |
The correlation between AEMSX and ABEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEMSX vs. ABEMX — Risk / Return Rank
AEMSX
ABEMX
AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc (AEMSX) and abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AEMSX | ABEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.55 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.59 | 4.61 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.19 | 17.28 | -0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEMSX drawdown since its inception was -38.58%, smaller than the maximum ABEMX drawdown of -54.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMSX and ABEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEMSX | ABEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.58% | -54.52% | +15.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.70% | -13.68% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | -18.62% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.65% | -36.56% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.58% | -38.44% | -0.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.18% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.55% | -13.08% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 3.65% | 0.00% |
Volatility
AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc (AEMSX) and abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) have volatilities of 11.67% and 11.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEMSX | ABEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.67% | 11.65% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.42% | 19.38% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.53% | 21.49% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 19.21% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 18.93% | 0.00% |
AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEMSX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ABEMX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
AEMSX vs. ABEMX - Dividend Comparison
AEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, which matches ABEMX's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEMX abrdn Emerging Markets Fund | 4.58% | 6.11% | 0.99% | 1.42% | 1.82% | 22.95% | 0.68% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 2.47% |
AEMSX abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc | 4.61% | 6.14% | 0.95% | 1.39% | 1.83% | 22.97% | 0.68% | 1.82% | 1.57% | 1.09% | 1.08% | 2.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, AEMSX and ABEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AEMSX has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to ABEMX (11.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEMSX dropped -38.58% vs ABEMX's -54.52%.
ABEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AEMSX and ABEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer