AEMGX vs. DRESX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

AEMGX (Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio) and DRESX (Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AEMGX returned 10.04%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for DRESX. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AEMGX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for DRESX.

Performance

AEMGX vs. DRESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMGX achieves a 18.01% return, which is significantly higher than DRESX's 2.62% return. Over the past 10 years, AEMGX has outperformed DRESX with an annualized return of 10.04%, while DRESX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.92% annualized return.

AEMGX

• 1D: 3.51%
• 1M: -4.69%
• 6M: 7.92%
• YTD: 18.01%
• 1Y: 34.52%
• 3Y*: 20.98%
• 5Y*: 10.55%
• 10Y*: 10.04%
• ALL TIME*: 8.14%

DRESX

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: -9.97%
• 6M: -5.73%
• YTD: 2.62%
• 1Y: 15.90%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: 5.18%
• 10Y*: 8.92%
• ALL TIME*: 7.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AEMGX Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
DRESX Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

AEMGX vs. DRESX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AEMGX Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio	18.01%	27.51%	13.91%	22.67%	-20.09%	6.96%	10.35%	18.01%	-18.67%	37.64%
DRESX Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund	2.62%	24.08%	14.86%	10.30%	-21.17%	15.93%	33.56%	33.70%	-24.00%	33.30%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMGX and DRESX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2011	0.74

The correlation between AEMGX and DRESX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AEMGX vs. DRESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AEMGX

AEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
AEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
AEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
AEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

DRESX

DRESX Risk / Return Rank: 21
DRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
DRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
DRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
DRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
DRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AEMGX vs. DRESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AEMGX	DRESX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	0.82	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	1.21	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.16	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	0.75	+1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.88	2.74	+4.14

AEMGX vs. DRESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the DRESX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEMGX and DRESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AEMGX vs. DRESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMGX drawdown since its inception was -70.30%, which is greater than DRESX's maximum drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMGX and DRESX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEMGX	DRESX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.30%	-33.38%	-36.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.83%	-20.40%	+5.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.20%	-20.40%	+4.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.00%	-25.88%	-8.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.36%	-33.38%	-7.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.84%	-19.05%	+7.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.03%	-9.91%	-9.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.63%	5.52%	-0.89%

Volatility

AEMGX vs. DRESX - Volatility Comparison

Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX) has a higher volatility of 9.57% compared to Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) at 7.19%. This indicates that AEMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AEMGX	DRESX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.57%	7.19%	+2.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.91%	16.63%	+4.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.85%	18.51%	+4.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.27%	15.41%	+1.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.47%	16.23%	+1.24%

AEMGX vs. DRESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMGX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DRESX's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

AEMGX vs. DRESX - Dividend Comparison

AEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than DRESX's 2.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AEMGX Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio	3.64%	4.30%	3.38%	3.85%	7.27%	3.15%	1.29%	1.79%	1.83%	1.30%	2.01%	1.27%
DRESX Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund	2.19%	2.25%	0.68%	1.09%	0.00%	0.04%	0.65%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEMGX and DRESX in my portfolio?

AEMGX and DRESX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AEMGX or DRESX?

AEMGX has higher volatility (9.57%) compared to DRESX (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEMGX dropped -70.30% vs DRESX's -33.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.