PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEMD.DE vs. IBC3.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEMD.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (AEMD.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMD.DE achieves a 27.93% return, which is significantly higher than IBC3.DE's 25.91% return.


AEMD.DE

1D
-1.54%
1M
6.52%
YTD
27.93%
6M
29.55%
1Y
50.42%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*

IBC3.DE

1D
-1.44%
1M
3.09%
YTD
25.91%
6M
26.49%
1Y
46.24%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMD.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AEMD.DE
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)
27.93%19.91%13.00%4.88%-14.15%4.10%6.56%21.56%-9.41%
IBC3.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF
25.91%17.59%14.06%7.48%-13.80%7.38%7.44%21.30%-9.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMD.DE and IBC3.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2018

0.99

The correlation between AEMD.DE and IBC3.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEMD.DE vs. IBC3.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEMD.DE
AEMD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AEMD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEMD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEMD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AEMD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEMD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IBC3.DE
IBC3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IBC3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBC3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBC3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IBC3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBC3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEMD.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (AEMD.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEMD.DEIBC3.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.49

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

4.51

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.70

16.28

+0.41

AEMD.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEMD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the IBC3.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEMD.DE and IBC3.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AEMD.DEIBC3.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

2.71

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.54

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.47

-0.08

Drawdowns

AEMD.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMD.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.80%, roughly equal to the maximum IBC3.DE drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMD.DE and IBC3.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEMD.DEIBC3.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.80%

-31.89%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-10.42%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

-19.08%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.88%

-21.95%

-1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-2.52%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.65%

-7.84%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.89%

+0.12%

Volatility

AEMD.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (AEMD.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) have volatilities of 7.37% and 7.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEMD.DEIBC3.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

7.06%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.13%

14.60%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

17.37%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

16.23%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.92%

18.42%

+0.50%

AEMD.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMD.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IBC3.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AEMD.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Dividend Comparison

AEMD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than IBC3.DE's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AEMD.DE
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)
1.51%1.93%2.33%2.51%3.20%2.23%1.69%2.32%2.14%
IBC3.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF
1.88%2.26%2.44%2.69%3.36%2.18%2.09%2.56%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, AEMD.DE and IBC3.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IBC3.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBC3.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AEMD.DE.

AEMD.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while IBC3.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AEMD.DE and 0.18% for IBC3.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEMD.DE and IBC3.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer