PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEM.TO vs. GILD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEM.TO vs. GILD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AEM.TO is traded in CAD, while GILD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GILD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEM.TO achieves a -2.49% return, which is significantly lower than GILD's 6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM.TO has outperformed GILD with an annualized return of 15.27%, while GILD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.99% annualized return.


AEM.TO

1D
-0.89%
1M
-14.34%
YTD
-2.49%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
41.16%
3Y*
52.05%
5Y*
24.22%
10Y*
15.27%

GILD

1D
-0.55%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
6.87%
6M
7.85%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
23.74%
5Y*
20.95%
10Y*
8.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEM.TO vs. GILD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-2.49%109.63%58.54%6.65%8.01%-23.56%13.64%46.58%-4.22%3.57%
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
6.87%30.36%28.73%-4.32%31.46%29.89%-8.91%3.43%-2.35%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AEM.TO and GILD is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEM.TO:

CA$113.39B

GILD:

$160.64B

EPS

AEM.TO:

CA$10.65

GILD:

$7.35

PE Ratio

AEM.TO:

21.22

GILD:

17.43

PEG Ratio

AEM.TO:

0.32

GILD:

0.04

PS Ratio

AEM.TO:

8.38

GILD:

5.40

PB Ratio

AEM.TO:

4.32

GILD:

6.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEM.TO:

CA$13.56B

GILD:

$29.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEM.TO:

CA$8.26B

GILD:

$18.74B

EBITDA (TTM)

AEM.TO:

CA$9.54B

GILD:

$12.88B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEM.TO vs. GILD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEM.TO
AEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GILD
GILD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEM.TO vs. GILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEM.TOGILDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.14

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.14

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

2.83

+0.35

AEM.TO vs. GILD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the GILD Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM.TO and GILD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AEM.TOGILDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.73

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.84

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.34

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.51

-0.26

Drawdowns

AEM.TO vs. GILD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.33%, which is greater than GILD's maximum drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM.TO and GILD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEM.TOGILDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.33%

-48.16%

-22.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.29%

-17.02%

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.29%

-25.87%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.35%

-25.87%

-16.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.07%

-36.49%

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.29%

-15.15%

-19.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.16%

-19.05%

-10.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.96%

6.84%

+6.12%

Volatility

AEM.TO vs. GILD - Volatility Comparison

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.83% compared to Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) at 6.81%. This indicates that AEM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GILD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEM.TOGILDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.83%

6.81%

+8.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.90%

18.57%

+16.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.09%

26.50%

+16.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.05%

25.06%

+9.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.95%

26.32%

+9.63%

Dividends

AEM.TO vs. GILD - Dividend Comparison

AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than GILD's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.04%0.97%1.95%2.98%2.81%2.08%1.34%0.81%0.80%0.77%0.75%0.95%
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.49%2.57%3.33%3.70%3.40%3.91%4.67%3.88%3.65%2.90%2.57%1.27%

Financials

AEM.TO vs. GILD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Gilead Sciences, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
4.10B
6.96B
(AEM.TO) Total Revenue
(GILD) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AEM.TO values in CAD, GILD values in USD

AEM.TO vs. GILD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Gilead Sciences, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
66.4%
1.1%
Portfolio components
AEM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

GILD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.20M and revenue of 6.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.1%.

AEM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.

GILD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.59B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.

AEM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.

GILD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a net income of 2.02B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AEM.TO and GILD have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEM.TO and GILD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer